Literature DB >> 20819528

Reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson histological grading system and the complementary value of Ki-67 to this system.

Rui Zhang1, Hui-jiao Chen, Bing Wei, Hong-ying Zhang, Zong-guo Pang, Hong Zhu, Zhang Zhang, Jing Fu, Hong Bu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (NSBR) histological grading system for invasive breast cancer (IBC) adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) has previously not been studied in Chinese hospitals. The proliferation marker, Ki-67, has been widely applied in detecting IBC. The objective of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the NSBR system among Chinese pathologists and the complementary value that Ki-67 brings to this system.
METHODS: Four general pathologists graded 100 IBC cases independently, which had previously been graded by specialists in breast pathology. The interobserver reproducibility among four general pathologists and pairwise reproducibility between each of them and the specialists were assessed. The Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67LI) was determined by immunohistochemistry, and its correlations with histological grade and survival were determined.
RESULTS: With respect to interobserver reproducibility, NSBR grading was fairly reproducible (kappa = 0.34); as for the components of NSBR grading, agreement was best for tubule formation (kappa = 0.46), intermediate for nuclear pleomorphism (kappa = 0.42), and poorest for mitotic count (kappa = 0.28). In terms of pairwise reproducibility, agreement was fair to substantial with NSBR grading (kappa = 0.30 - 0.69) and nuclear pleomorphism (kappa = 0.28 - 0.69), moderate to substantial for tubule formation (kappa = 0.51 - 0.78), and slight to substantial for mitotic count (kappa = 0.19 - 0.71). There were characteristic Ki-67LI ranges for grades 1, 2 and 3 tumors. Univariate analysis showed that Ki-67 was able to divide grade 2 patients into two different prognostic subgroups. Multivariate analysis of grade 2 patients with negative lymph node demonstrated that Ki-67 was an independent prognosticator for overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of grading by general pathologists could be enhanced. Specialization in breast pathology is essential for accurate grading and treatment for IBC. Ki-67, with proven prognostic significance, adds complementary value to the NSBR system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20819528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  9 in total

1.  Computer-Assisted Nuclear Atypia Scoring of Breast Cancer: a Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Ziba Gandomkar; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Ki-67 and caspase expression in breast carcinoma: does variance in locational sampling exist?

Authors:  Filinte Deniz; Kaymakci Dilek; Mollamemisoglu Hande; Ugurlu M Umit; Kaya Handan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

3.  How reliable is Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in grade 2 breast carcinomas? A QA study of the Swiss Working Group of Breast- and Gynecopathologists.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Varga; Joachim Diebold; Corina Dommann-Scherrer; Harald Frick; Daniela Kaup; Aurelia Noske; Ellen Obermann; Christian Ohlschlegel; Barbara Padberg; Christiane Rakozy; Sara Sancho Oliver; Sylviane Schobinger-Clement; Heide Schreiber-Facklam; Gad Singer; Coya Tapia; Urs Wagner; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giuseppe Viale; Hans-Anton Lehr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Tumor tissue protein signatures reflect histological grade of breast cancer.

Authors:  Petter Skoog; Mattias Ohlsson; Mårten Fernö; Lisa Rydén; Carl A K Borrebaeck; Christer Wingren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Variation in breast cancer grading in 1,636 resections assessed using control charts and in silico kappa.

Authors:  Jinesa Moodley; Phillip Williams; Gabriela Gohla; Pierre Major; Michael Bonert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy.

Authors:  Paula S Ginter; Romana Idress; Timothy M D'Alfonso; Susan Fineberg; Shabnam Jaffer; Abida K Sattar; Anees Chagpar; Parker Wilson; Malini Harigopal
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Defining the area of mitoses counting in invasive breast cancer using whole slide image.

Authors:  Asmaa Ibrahim; Ayat G Lashen; Ayaka Katayama; Raluca Mihai; Graham Ball; Michael S Toss; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 8.209

8.  Expression of MiRNA-29b and MiRNA-31 and their diagnostic and prognostic values in Egyptian females with breast cancer.

Authors:  Mona Ahmed Abbas; Ibrahim El Tantawy El Sayed; Azza Mohamed Kamel Abdu-Allah; Abul Kalam; Abdullah G Al-Sehemi; Omar A Al-Hartomy; Maha Salah Abd El-Rahman
Journal:  Noncoding RNA Res       Date:  2022-09-06

9.  Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.

Authors:  Tara M Davidson; Mara H Rendi; Paul D Frederick; Tracy Onega; Kimberly H Allison; Ezgi Mercan; Tad T Brunyé; Linda G Shapiro; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2019-04-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.