Literature DB >> 20819319

Efficacy of oral olopatadine hydrochloride for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Hideyuki Yamamoto1, Takechiyo Yamada, Seita Kubo, Yoko Osawa, Yuichi Kimura, Myonmi Oh, Dai Susuki, Tetsuji Takabayashi, Masayuki Okamoto, Shigeharu Fujieda.   

Abstract

Adequate treatment is critical for maintaining a good level of quality of life (QOL) during the pollen season in patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Olopatadine, a histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist, has been approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of AR and allergic conjunctivitis as a nasal spray and an ophthalmic solution, respectively. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine whether orally administered olopatadine for prophylactic purposes might also be effective for the control of nasal allergy symptoms, especially nasal congestion, in patients with SAR due to Japanese cedar pollen (SAR-JP). A total of 110 patients with SAR caused by JP were randomized to the treatment. The subjects recorded their nasal and ocular allergic symptom scores in a diary, and their QOL was assessed by the Japanese version of the Rhinoconjunctivity Quality of Life Questionnaire. Treatment with oral olopatadine significantly suppressed sneezing (p < 0.001), rhinorrhea (p < 0.001), and nasal congestion (p < 0.05). The total QOL score during the peak JP season was superior in the olopatadine group than in the placebo group (p < 0.05). However, orally administered olopatadine did not exert any significant effect against eye itching and watering of the eyes, unlike olopatadine nasal spray. Treatment with olopatadine tablets yielded superior QOL scores in the domains of usual daily activities and outdoor activities when compared with placebo. No serious adverse effects of the treatment were reported during the study period. These results suggest that oral olopatadine treatment may be a useful alternative treatment strategy for AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20819319     DOI: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc        ISSN: 1088-5412            Impact factor:   2.587


  5 in total

1.  Sublingual immunotherapy for 4 years increased the number of Foxp3+ Treg cells, which correlated with clinical effects.

Authors:  Tetsuya Terada; Masaya Matsuda; Miki Inaba; Junpei Hamaguchi; Naoki Takemoto; Yusuke Kikuoka; Yuko Inaka; Harumi Sakae; Kennosuke Hashimoto; Hayato Shimora; Kazuyuki Kitatani; Ryo Kawata; Takeshi Nabe
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.575

2.  [Evidence-based treatment options for allergic diseases in otolaryngology: an update].

Authors:  L Klimek; A Sperl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  CryJ-LAMP DNA Vaccines for Japanese Red Cedar Allergy Induce Robust Th1-Type Immune Responses in Murine Model.

Authors:  Yan Su; Michael Connolly; Anthony Marketon; Teri Heiland
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.818

4.  The assessment of the optimal duration of early intervention with montelukast in the treatment of Japanese cedar pollinosis symptoms induced in an artificial exposure chamber.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hashiguchi; Kimihiro Okubo; Ken-Ichiro Wakabayashi; Nobuaki Tanaka; Yukiko Watada; Kiyochika Suematsu; Minoru Gotoh
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2012-10-09

5.  Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rupatadine and olopatadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study.

Authors:  Ganesh Dakhale; Yogesh Tathod; Seema Patel; Sonali Pimpalkhute; Latesh Raghute; Ajita Khamkar
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.