N Morcillo1, B Imperiale, B Di Giulio. 1. Buenos Aires Province Tuberculosis Control Program Reference Laboratory, Dr Cetrángolo Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina. nora_morcillo@yahoo.com.ar
Abstract
SETTING: Dr Cetrángolo Hospital, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system and the colorimetric-based method (CMM) for first- and second-line drug susceptibility testing (FL-DST, SL-DST) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. DESIGN: FL-DST was studied using SIRE MGIT 960. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for isoniazid (INH), streptomycin, rifampicin (RMP), ethambutol (EMB) and levofloxacin (LVX) were also determined by CMM using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). MICs for amikacin (AMK), kanamycin (KM), capreomycin (CPM), ethionamide (ETH), cycloserine, ofloxacin (OFX), linezolide (LZ) and moxifloxacin (MFX) were determined on 94 multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates by MGIT 960 and CMM. Statistical methods were applied to define drug-susceptible and drug-resistant isolates on the basis of the comparison between results obtained by gold standards. RESULTS: A total of 1626 clinical isolates were studied. Critical drug concentrations could be defined in less than 10 days for both CMM and MGIT 960. CMM was cheaper but more laborious than MGIT 960. The highest performances of both methods were achieved for AMK, RMP, OFX, LZ and MFX, followed by INH, ETH, KM, CPM and LVX (tested only by CMM). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods could be implemented as rapid diagnostic tools to detect drug-resistant isolates in clinical practice.
SETTING: Dr Cetrángolo Hospital, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system and the colorimetric-based method (CMM) for first- and second-line drug susceptibility testing (FL-DST, SL-DST) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. DESIGN: FL-DST was studied using SIRE MGIT 960. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for isoniazid (INH), streptomycin, rifampicin (RMP), ethambutol (EMB) and levofloxacin (LVX) were also determined by CMM using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). MICs for amikacin (AMK), kanamycin (KM), capreomycin (CPM), ethionamide (ETH), cycloserine, ofloxacin (OFX), linezolide (LZ) and moxifloxacin (MFX) were determined on 94 multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates by MGIT 960 and CMM. Statistical methods were applied to define drug-susceptible and drug-resistant isolates on the basis of the comparison between results obtained by gold standards. RESULTS: A total of 1626 clinical isolates were studied. Critical drug concentrations could be defined in less than 10 days for both CMM and MGIT 960. CMM was cheaper but more laborious than MGIT 960. The highest performances of both methods were achieved for AMK, RMP, OFX, LZ and MFX, followed by INH, ETH, KM, CPM and LVX (tested only by CMM). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods could be implemented as rapid diagnostic tools to detect drug-resistant isolates in clinical practice.
Authors: María V Bianco; Federico C Blanco; Belén Imperiale; Marina A Forrellad; Roxana V Rocha; Laura I Klepp; Angel A Cataldi; Nora Morcillo; Fabiana Bigi Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2011-07-16 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: B R Imperiale; A García; A Minotti; P González Montaner; L Moracho; N S Morcillo; D J Palmero; M Del Carmen Sasiain; S de la Barrera Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Halima M Said; Marleen M Kock; Nazir A Ismail; Kamaldeen Baba; Shaheed V Omar; Ayman G Osman; Anwar A Hoosen; Marthie M Ehlers Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2012-12-22 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Mariana Noelia Viale; Kun Taek Park; Belén Imperiale; Andrea Karina Gioffre; María Alejandra Colombatti Olivieri; Roberto Damián Moyano; Nora Morcillo; María de la Paz Santangelo; William Davis; María Isabel Romano Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 3.411