Literature DB >> 20819159

Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics.

E L Landguth1, S A Cushman, M K Schwartz, K S McKelvey, M Murphy, G Luikart.   

Abstract

Understanding how spatial genetic patterns respond to landscape change is crucial for advancing the emerging field of landscape genetics. We quantified the number of generations for new landscape barrier signatures to become detectable and for old signatures to disappear after barrier removal. We used spatially explicit, individual-based simulations to examine the ability of an individual-based statistic [Mantel's r using the proportion of shared alleles' statistic (Dps)] and population-based statistic (FST ) to detect barriers. We simulated a range of movement strategies including nearest neighbour dispersal, long-distance dispersal and panmixia. The lag time for the signal of a new barrier to become established is short using Mantel's r (1-15 generations). FST required approximately 200 generations to reach 50% of its equilibrium maximum, although G'ST performed much like Mantel's r. In strong contrast, FST and Mantel's r perform similarly following the removal of a barrier formerly dividing a population. Also, given neighbour mating and very short-distance dispersal strategies, historical discontinuities from more than 100 generations ago might still be detectable with either method. This suggests that historical events and landscapes could have long-term effects that confound inferences about the impacts of current landscape features on gene flow for species with very little long-distance dispersal. Nonetheless, populations of organisms with relatively large dispersal distances will lose the signal of a former barrier within less than 15 generations, suggesting that individual-based landscape genetic approaches can improve our ability to measure effects of existing landscape features on genetic structure and connectivity.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Keywords:  computer simulation; connectivity; conservation genetics; gene flow; habitat fragmentation; landscape modelling; power analysis; resistance surfaces; spatial analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20819159     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04808.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  79 in total

1.  Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation during a range expansion.

Authors:  S Mona; N Ray; M Arenas; L Excoffier
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Low genetic diversity and strong population structure shaped by anthropogenic habitat fragmentation in a critically endangered primate, Trachypithecus leucocephalus.

Authors:  W Wang; Y Qiao; S Li; W Pan; M Yao
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Kin-dependent dispersal influences relatedness and genetic structuring in a lek system.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Laurent Boualit; Martin Laporte; Jérôme G Prunier; Françoise Preiss; Alain Laurent; Francesco Foletti; Jean Clobert; Gwenaël Jacob
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Estimation of effective population size in continuously distributed populations: there goes the neighborhood.

Authors:  M C Neel; K McKelvey; N Ryman; M W Lloyd; R Short Bull; F W Allendorf; M K Schwartz; R S Waples
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Pulses of movement across the sea ice: population connectivity and temporal genetic structure in the arctic fox.

Authors:  Karin Norén; Lindsey Carmichael; Eva Fuglei; Nina E Eide; Pall Hersteinsson; Anders Angerbjörn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Evidence of spatial genetic structure in a snow leopard population from Gansu, China.

Authors:  Luciano Atzeni; Samuel A Cushman; Jun Wang; Philip Riordan; Kun Shi; David Bauman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Genetic connectivity for two bear species at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.

Authors:  Michael A Sawaya; Steven T Kalinowski; Anthony P Clevenger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Fine-scale landscape genetics of the American badger (Taxidea taxus): disentangling landscape effects and sampling artifacts in a poorly understood species.

Authors:  E M Kierepka; E K Latch
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Pronghorn population genomics show connectivity in the core of their range.

Authors:  Melanie E F LaCava; Roderick B Gagne; Sierra M Love Stowell; Kyle D Gustafson; C Alex Buerkle; Lee Knox; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.416

10.  Riverscape genetics in brook lamprey: genetic diversity is less influenced by river fragmentation than by gene flow with the anadromous ecotype.

Authors:  Quentin Rougemont; Victoria Dolo; Adrien Oger; Anne-Laure Besnard; Dominique Huteau; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Charles Perrier; Sophie Launey; Guillaume Evanno
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.