BACKGROUND: In observational studies, the relationship between blood pressure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is direct and progressive. The burden of hypertension-related chronic kidney disease and ESRD is especially high among black patients. Yet few trials have tested whether intensive blood-pressure control retards the progression of chronic kidney disease among black patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1094 black patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease to receive eitherintensive or standard blood-pressure control. After completing the trial phase, patients were invited to enroll in a cohort phase in which the blood-pressure target was less than 130/80 mm Hg. The primary clinical outcome in the cohort phase was the progression of chronic kidney disease, which was defined as a doubling of the serum creatinine level, a diagnosis of ESRD, or death. Follow-up ranged from 8.8 to 12.2 years. RESULTS: During the trial phase, the mean blood pressure was 130/78 mm Hg in the intensive-control group and 141/86 mm Hg in the standard-control group. During the cohort phase, corresponding mean blood pressures were 131/78 mm Hg and 134/78 mm Hg. In both phases, there was no significant between-group difference in the risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio in the intensive-control group, 0.91; P=0.27). However, the effects differed according to the baseline level of proteinuria (P=0.02 for interaction), with a potential benefit in patients with a protein-to-creatinine ratio of more than 0.22 (hazard ratio, 0.73; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In overall analyses, intensive blood-pressure control had no effect on kidney disease progression. However, there may be differential effects of intensive blood-pressure control in patients with and those without baseline proteinuria. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, and others.)
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In observational studies, the relationship between blood pressure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is direct and progressive. The burden of hypertension-related chronic kidney disease and ESRD is especially high among black patients. Yet few trials have tested whether intensive blood-pressure control retards the progression of chronic kidney disease among black patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1094 black patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease to receive either intensive or standard blood-pressure control. After completing the trial phase, patients were invited to enroll in a cohort phase in which the blood-pressure target was less than 130/80 mm Hg. The primary clinical outcome in the cohort phase was the progression of chronic kidney disease, which was defined as a doubling of the serum creatinine level, a diagnosis of ESRD, or death. Follow-up ranged from 8.8 to 12.2 years. RESULTS: During the trial phase, the mean blood pressure was 130/78 mm Hg in the intensive-control group and 141/86 mm Hg in the standard-control group. During the cohort phase, corresponding mean blood pressures were 131/78 mm Hg and 134/78 mm Hg. In both phases, there was no significant between-group difference in the risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio in the intensive-control group, 0.91; P=0.27). However, the effects differed according to the baseline level of proteinuria (P=0.02 for interaction), with a potential benefit in patients with a protein-to-creatinine ratio of more than 0.22 (hazard ratio, 0.73; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In overall analyses, intensive blood-pressure control had no effect on kidney disease progression. However, there may be differential effects of intensive blood-pressure control in patients with and those without baseline proteinuria. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, and others.)
Authors: Jackson T Wright; George Bakris; Tom Greene; Larry Y Agodoa; Lawrence J Appel; Jeanne Charleston; DeAnna Cheek; Janice G Douglas-Baltimore; Jennifer Gassman; Richard Glassock; Lee Hebert; Kenneth Jamerson; Julia Lewis; Robert A Phillips; Robert D Toto; John P Middleton; Stephen G Rostand Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: T H Jafar; C H Schmid; M Landa; I Giatras; R Toto; G Remuzzi; G Maschio; B M Brenner; A Kamper; P Zucchelli; G Becker; A Himmelmann; K Bannister; P Landais; S Shahinfar; P E de Jong; D de Zeeuw; J Lau; A S Levey Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-07-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: L Y Agodoa; L Appel; G L Bakris; G Beck; J Bourgoignie; J P Briggs; J Charleston; D Cheek; W Cleveland; J G Douglas; M Douglas; D Dowie; M Faulkner; A Gabriel; J Gassman; T Greene; Y Hall; L Hebert; L Hiremath; K Jamerson; C J Johnson; J Kopple; J Kusek; J Lash; J Lea; J B Lewis; M Lipkowitz; S Massry; J Middleton; E R Miller; K Norris; D O'Connor; A Ojo; R A Phillips; V Pogue; M Rahman; O S Randall; S Rostand; G Schulman; W Smith; D Thornley-Brown; C C Tisher; R D Toto; J T Wright; S Xu Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-06-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Velvie Pogue; Mahboob Rahman; Michael Lipkowitz; Robert Toto; Edgar Miller; Marquetta Faulkner; Stephen Rostand; Leena Hiremath; Mohammed Sika; Cynthia Kendrick; Bo Hu; Tom Greene; Lawrence Appel; Robert A Phillips Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Elke Wühl; Antonella Trivelli; Stefano Picca; Mieczyslaw Litwin; Amira Peco-Antic; Aleksandra Zurowska; Sara Testa; Augustina Jankauskiene; Sevinc Emre; Alberto Caldas-Afonso; Ali Anarat; Patrick Niaudet; Sevgi Mir; Aysin Bakkaloglu; Barbara Enke; Giovanni Montini; Ann-Margret Wingen; Peter Sallay; Nikola Jeck; Ulla Berg; Salim Caliskan; Simone Wygoda; Katharina Hohbach-Hohenfellner; Jiri Dusek; Tomasz Urasinski; Klaus Arbeiter; Thomas Neuhaus; Jutta Gellermann; Dorota Drozdz; Michel Fischbach; Kristina Möller; Marianne Wigger; Licia Peruzzi; Otto Mehls; Franz Schaefer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jennifer J Gassman; Tom Greene; Jackson T Wright; Lawrence Agodoa; George Bakris; Gerald J Beck; Janice Douglas; Ken Jamerson; Julia Lewis; Michael Kutner; Otelio S Randall; Shin-Ru Wang Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Raj S Padwal; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Nadia A Khan; Steven Grover; Donald W McKay; Thomas Wilson; Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Finlay A McAlister; Peter Bolli; Machael D Hill; Jeff Mahon; Martin G Myers; Carl Abbott; Ernesto L Schiffrin; George Honos; Karen Mann; Guy Tremblay; Alain Milot; Lyne Cloutier; Arun Chockalingam; Simon W Rabkin; Martin Dawes; Rhian M Touyz; Chaim Bell; Kevin D Burns; Marcel Ruzicka; Norman R C Campbell; Michel Vallée; Ramesh Prasad; Marcel Lebel; Sheldon W Tobe Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Jackson T Wright; Lawrence Y Agodoa; Lawrence Appel; William C Cushman; Anne L Taylor; Gbenga G Obegdegbe; Kwame Osei; James Reed Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Adrienne S Allen; John P Forman; E John Orav; David W Bates; Bradley M Denker; Thomas D Sequist Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Barry I Freedman; Carl D Langefeld; Mariana Murea; Lijun Ma; James D Otvos; Jolyn Turner; Peter A Antinozzi; Jasmin Divers; Pamela J Hicks; Donald W Bowden; Michael V Rocco; John S Parks Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Bo Hu; Crystal Gadegbeku; Michael S Lipkowitz; Stephen Rostand; Julia Lewis; Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Appel; Tom Greene; Jennifer Gassman; Brad C Astor Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Dana C Miskulin; Jennifer Gassman; Ronald Schrader; Ambreen Gul; Manisha Jhamb; David W Ploth; Lavinia Negrea; Raymond Y Kwong; Andrew S Levey; Ajay K Singh; Antonia Harford; Susan Paine; Cynthia Kendrick; Mahboob Rahman; Philip Zager Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 10.121