Literature DB >> 20818649

Intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis and single-institution experience.

Liang-Chih Liu1, Julie E Lang, Ying Lu, Denise Roe, Shelley E Hwang, Cheryl A Ewing, Laura J Esserman, Eugene Morita, Patrick Treseler, Stanley P Leong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate intraoperative pathologic examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has been an important tool that can reduce the need for reoperations in patients with SLN-positive breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to determine the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section (IFS) of SLNs during breast cancer surgery.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 326 patients with breast cancer who underwent IF analysis of SLNs at a single institution. Then, they conducted a meta-analysis that included 47 published studies of IFS of SLNs in patients with breast cancer.
RESULTS: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&amp;E) staining revealed metastasis in SLNs in 99 patients (30.4%), including 61 patients with macrometastasis (MAM) (>2 mm) (the MAM group) and 38 patients with micrometastasis (Mi) or isolated tumor cell (ITC) deposits (the Mi/ITC group). The overall sensitivity of the institutional series was 60.6% (60 of 99 patients), and overall specificity was 100% (227 of 227 true negatives). The sensitivity of IFS was significantly lower in the Mi/ITC group (28.9%) than in the MAM group (80.3%; P < .0001). According to the meta-analysis of published studies and data from the author's institution (47 studies, for a total of 13,062 patients who underwent SLN dissection with IFS of SLNs), the mean sensitivity was 73%, and the mean specificity was 100%. The mean sensitivity was 94% for the MAM group and 40% for the Mi/ITC group.
CONCLUSIONS: IFS of SLNs was more reliable for detecting MAM than for detecting Mi/ITC deposits. It lacked sufficient accuracy to rule out Mi/ITC deposits.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20818649     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  Assessment of breast pathologies using nonlinear microscopy.

Authors:  Yuankai K Tao; Dejun Shen; Yuri Sheikine; Osman O Ahsen; Helen H Wang; Daniel B Schmolze; Nicole B Johnson; Jeffrey S Brooker; Alex E Cable; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  OSNA (one-step nucleic acid amplification) sentinel lymph node intraoperative molecular analysis in breast cancer: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Tiphaine Raia-Barjat; Béatrice Trombert; Abir Khaddage; Catherine Douchet; Pierre Seffert; Michel Peoc'h; Alexander Tuan Falk; Nicolas Magné; Céline Chauleur
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Accuracy of One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification in Detecting Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Raffone; Antonio Travaglino; Angela Santoro; Italia Esposito; Giuseppe Angelico; Saveria Spadola; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Frozen section evaluation of breast carcinoma sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective review of 1,940 cases.

Authors:  Justin S Poling; Theodore N Tsangaris; Pedram Argani; Ashley Cimino-Mathews
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Touch imprint cytology evaluation of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.

Authors:  Rahul Khanna; Shilpi Bhadani; Seema Khanna; Manoj Pandey; Mohan Kumar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer using superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide: early clinical experience.

Authors:  M Staník; D Macík; I Čapák; N Marečková; E Lžíčařová; J Doležel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Carcinoma: A Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Detection of Metastatic Breast and Thyroid Cancer in Lymph Nodes by Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Authors:  Jialing Zhang; Clara L Feider; Chandandeep Nagi; Wendong Yu; Stacey A Carter; James Suliburk; Hop S Tran Cao; Livia S Eberlin
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Factors impacting the accuracy of intra-operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine L Akay; Constance Albarracin; Tiffany Torstenson; Roland Bassett; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Min Yi; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy V Babiera; Isabelle Bedrosian; Kelly K Hunt; Rosa F Hwang
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 10.  Sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: an update on current practice.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.