Literature DB >> 20818422

Interfering with RAS-effector protein interactions prevent RAS-dependent tumour initiation and causes stop-start control of cancer growth.

T Tanaka1, T H Rabbitts.   

Abstract

RAS mutations are the most common gain-of-function change in human cancer and promise to be a critical therapy target. As a new approach, we have used a surrogate to drug the 'undruggable' (that is, RAS-effector protein-protein interactions inside cancer cells) in pre-clinical mouse models of RAS-dependent cancers. Using this novel reagent, we have specifically targeted RAS signalling in a transgenic mouse model of lung cancer by directly blockading RAS-effector interactions with an antibody fragment that binds to activated RAS, and show that the interaction of RAS and effectors, such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase and RAF, is necessary for tumour initiation. Further, interference with oncogenic RAS-effector interactions result in control of tumour growth in human cancer cells but, crucially, does not necessarily cause tumour regression. These findings support the concept that ablating RAS-dependent signalling in cancer will have chemo-preventive effects that confer a chronic state in cancer and suggest that mutant RAS-targeted therapies may require conjoint targeting of other molecules and/or current cancer therapeutic strategies (for example, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) to be curative. In this context, our findings suggest that the oncogene addiction model is not universally correct in its central thesis that cancer cell death is inevitable after loss of oncogenic protein function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20818422     DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  29 in total

Review 1.  How to Target Activated Ras Proteins: Direct Inhibition vs. Induced Mislocalization.

Authors:  Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; John J Reiners; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 2.  Ras and Rap1: A tale of two GTPases.

Authors:  Seema Shah; Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 3.  Biology, pathology, and therapeutic targeting of RAS.

Authors:  J Matthew Rhett; Imran Khan; John P O'Bryan
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 6.242

Review 4.  Targeting Ras with Macromolecules.

Authors:  Dehua Pei; Kuangyu Chen; Hui Liao
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  The RAS-Effector Interaction as a Drug Target.

Authors:  Adam B Keeton; E Alan Salter; Gary A Piazza
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  PI3K: A Crucial Piece in the RAS Signaling Puzzle.

Authors:  Agata Adelajda Krygowska; Esther Castellano
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

7.  A switch I mutant of Cdc42 exhibits less conformational freedom.

Authors:  Reena Chandrashekar; Omar Salem; Hana Krizova; Robert McFeeters; Paul D Adams
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  Small-molecule modulation of Ras signaling.

Authors:  Jochen Spiegel; Philipp M Cromm; Gunther Zimmermann; Tom N Grossmann; Herbert Waldmann
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 9.  Direct inhibition of RAS: Quest for the Holy Grail?

Authors:  Russell Spencer-Smith; John P O'Bryan
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 10.  Therapeutic targeting of RAS: New hope for drugging the "undruggable".

Authors:  Imran Khan; J Matthew Rhett; John P O'Bryan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.