Literature DB >> 20818325

Stones. A matter of doubt--how best to evaluate stone formers.

Fredric L Coe1.   

Abstract

Once again the question of one versus two 24 h urine collections for diagnosis in kidney stone prevention has been raised. As in all previous studies, no difference is seen in the mean levels of analytes between first and second collections. However, variation within patients is so marked that at least two collections are needed for confidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20818325     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  3 in total

1.  A single 24-hour urine collection is inadequate for the medical evaluation of nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Joan H Parks; Evan Goldfisher; John R Asplin; Fredric L Coe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Kidney stone disease.

Authors:  Fredric L Coe; Andrew Evan; Elaine Worcester
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Adequacy of a single 24-hour urine collection for metabolic evaluation of recurrent nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Scott M Castle; Matthew R Cooperberg; Natalia Sadetsky; Brian H Eisner; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 7.450

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.