Literature DB >> 2081797

A report on 100 cycles of oocyte donation; factors affecting the outcome.

H I Abdalla1, R Baber, A Kirkland, T Leonard, M Power, J W Studd.   

Abstract

Eighty-two patients had 100 cycles of oocyte donation from 68 donors resulting in 27 clinical pregnancies. The source of donated oocytes was 42 fertile volunteers and 26 patients from the assisted conception programme. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher when intra-Fallopian transfer was performed (36%; 21/59), compared with intrauterine transfer (15%; 6/41). The pregnancy rate following fresh gamete/embryo transfer (39%; 15/39) was slightly higher than for frozen embryo transfer (20%; 12/61). The age of the recipient significantly affected the pregnancy rate. The pregnancy rate was 50% in the 25-29 years age group and steadily dropped to 9.7% in the 45-49 age group. The pregnancy rate in patients with primary ovarian failure (50%; 8/16) was significantly higher than in patients with secondary ovarian failure (18%; 9/50). The pregnancy rate was significantly greater when parous donors (33%; 23/69) were used compared with non-parous donors (13%; 4/31). The number of gametes/embryos transferred significantly affected the pregnancy rate regardless of the treatment used. If one or two gametes/embryos were transferred, the pregnancy rate was 11% compared with 33% if three to four embryos were transferred. The age of the donors did not affect the pregnancy rate. The majority of the donors were under the age of 35 years. The best results (50% per cycle) were therefore achieved using gametes from parous donors and transferring three to four oocytes fresh to the Fallopian tubes of a young recipient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2081797     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

Review 1.  FSH Actions and Pregnancy: Looking Beyond Ovarian FSH Receptors.

Authors:  Julie A W Stilley; Deborah L Segaloff
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Is younger better? Donor age less than 25 does not predict more favorable outcomes after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Leigh A Humphries; Laura E Dodge; Erin B Kennedy; Kathryn C Humm; Michele R Hacker; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The upper age limit for egg donation recipients.

Authors:  D Saunders; M Bowman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Age limitation in human reproduction: is it justified?

Authors:  A Benshushan; J G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Ovum donation--an overview.

Authors:  A Benshushan; J G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.

Authors:  D A Greenfeld; C M Mazure; D L Olive; D L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The making of 'old eggs': the science of reproductive ageing between fertility and anti-ageing technologies.

Authors:  Nolwenn Bühler
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2021-08-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.