Literature DB >> 20817912

Overheard cell-phone conversations: when less speech is more distracting.

Lauren L Emberson1, Gary Lupyan, Michael H Goldstein, Michael J Spivey.   

Abstract

Why are people more irritated by nearby cell-phone conversations than by conversations between two people who are physically present? Overhearing someone on a cell phone means hearing only half of a conversation--a "halfalogue." We show that merely overhearing a halfalogue results in decreased performance on cognitive tasks designed to reflect the attentional demands of daily activities. By contrast, overhearing both sides of a cell-phone conversation or a monologue does not result in decreased performance. This may be because the content of a halfalogue is less predictable than both sides of a conversation. In a second experiment, we controlled for differences in acoustic factors between these types of overheard speech, establishing that it is the unpredictable informational content of halfalogues that results in distraction. Thus, we provide a cognitive explanation for why overheard cell-phone conversations are especially irritating: Less-predictable speech results in more distraction for a listener engaged in other tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20817912     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610382126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  6 in total

1.  Toddlers' word learning through overhearing: Others' attention matters.

Authors:  Allison Fitch; Amy M Lieberman; Rhiannon J Luyster; Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2020-01-25

2.  A preliminary investigation regarding the effect of tennis grunting: does white noise during a tennis shot have a negative impact on shot perception?

Authors:  Scott Sinnett; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing.

Authors:  Marijke Keus van de Poll; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-04-13

4.  It is not good to talk: conversation has a fixed interference cost on attention regardless of difficulty.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Louise Cole; Angeline Cox; Jessica Ocampo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-08-22

5.  The effects of cell phone conversations on the attention and memory of bystanders.

Authors:  Veronica V Galván; Rosa S Vessal; Matthew T Golley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Background Speech Effects on Sentence Processing during Reading: An Eye Movement Study.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Miia Ekholm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.