Literature DB >> 20817322

Anticipation of tennis-shot direction from whole-body movement: the role of movement amplitude and dynamics.

N J Smeeton1, R Huys.   

Abstract

While recent studies indicate that observers are able to use dynamic information to anticipate whole-body actions like tennis shots, it is less clear whether the action's amplitude may also allow for anticipation. We therefore examined the role of movement dynamics and amplitude for the anticipation of tennis-shot direction. In a previous study, movement dynamics and amplitude were separated from the kinematics of tennis players' forehand groundstrokes. In the present study, these were manipulated and tennis shots were simulated. Three conditions were created in which shot-direction differences were either preserved or removed: Dynamics-Present-Amplitude-Present (D(P)A(P)), Dynamics-Present-Amplitude-Absent (D(P)A(A)), and Dynamics-Absent-Amplitude-Present (D(A)A(P)). Nineteen low-skill and 15 intermediate-skill tennis players watched the simulated shots and predicted shot direction from movements prior to ball-racket contact only. Percent of correctly predicted shots per condition was measured. On average, both groups' performance was superior when the dynamics were present (the D(P)A(P) and D(P)A(A) conditions) compared to when it was absent (the D(A)A(P) condition). However, the intermediate-skill players performed above chance independent of amplitude differences in shots (i.e., both the D(P)A(P) and D(P)A(A) conditions), whereas the low-skill group only performed above chance when amplitude differences were absent (the D(P)A(A) condition). These results suggest that the movement's dynamics but not their amplitude provides information from which tennis-shot direction can be anticipated. Furthermore, the successful extraction of dynamical information may be hampered by amplitude differences in a skill-dependent manner.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20817322     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  7 in total

1.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

2.  Neural underpinnings of superior action prediction abilities in soccer players.

Authors:  Stergios Makris; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Anticipating the Direction of Soccer Penalty Shots Depends on the Speed and Technique of the Kick.

Authors:  Andrew H Hunter; Sean C Murphy; Michael J Angilletta; Robbie S Wilson
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-29

4.  Time will show: real time predictions during interpersonal action perception.

Authors:  Valeria Manera; Ben Schouten; Karl Verfaillie; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  When less is more: reduced usefulness training for the learning of anticipation skill in tennis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Smeeton; Raoul Huys; David M Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Where Are You Throwing the Ball? I Better Watch Your Body, Not Just Your Arm!

Authors:  Antonella Maselli; Aishwar Dhawan; Benedetta Cesqui; Marta Russo; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The Difference in Perceptual Anticipation Between Professional Tennis Athletes and Second-Grade Athletes Before Batting.

Authors:  Rong Shangguan; Yuanyuan Che
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.