BACKGROUND: Western studies have shown that patients with mild or moderate cognitive impairment (CI) can use pain intensity scales to report pain reliably and validly, however, the qualities of pain intensity scales use in various age groups including elderly with CI are varied. In China, there is a lack of studies. OBJECTIVE: To compare psychometric properties of five evidence-supported pain intensity scales including the Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Faces Pain Scale (FPS), the Numeric Box-21 Scale (BS-21), and the Colored Analogue Scale (CAS) in postoperative adults varying in ages including elderly with mild CI. DESIGN: Descriptive comparative study. SETTING: A university-affiliated hospital in China. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred surgical patients were recruited purposively with 50 for each group: young adults, middle-aged adults, elderly without CI, and elderly with mild CI. METHODS: Participants rated the vividly remembered, current, worst, least, and average pain, and indicated scale preference and simplicity. Scale face validity, concurrent validity, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability were assessed. Fisher's exact tests were used to investigate whether face validity was related to different age groups and levels of CI. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to test the differences of concurrent validity, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability coefficients of each pain scale among the four groups. RESULTS: Regarding face validity, the FPS was ranked best as nearly half of the patients selected it as both the most preferred and simplest scale and it had low errors; the VDS and the NRS were ranked following the FPS; however, the BS-21 and the CAS were ranked last. The concurrent validity, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability of all five pain scales were supported in use with the four groups. The differences in psychometric properties among the four groups were only found in face validity and test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: The findings support the psychometric properties of all five pain scales for pain assessment in Chinese adults including elderly with mild CI. However, the FPS appears to be the best, followed by the VDS and the NRS.
BACKGROUND: Western studies have shown that patients with mild or moderate cognitive impairment (CI) can use pain intensity scales to report pain reliably and validly, however, the qualities of pain intensity scales use in various age groups including elderly with CI are varied. In China, there is a lack of studies. OBJECTIVE: To compare psychometric properties of five evidence-supported pain intensity scales including the Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Faces Pain Scale (FPS), the Numeric Box-21 Scale (BS-21), and the Colored Analogue Scale (CAS) in postoperative adults varying in ages including elderly with mild CI. DESIGN: Descriptive comparative study. SETTING: A university-affiliated hospital in China. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred surgical patients were recruited purposively with 50 for each group: young adults, middle-aged adults, elderly without CI, and elderly with mild CI. METHODS:Participants rated the vividly remembered, current, worst, least, and average pain, and indicated scale preference and simplicity. Scale face validity, concurrent validity, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability were assessed. Fisher's exact tests were used to investigate whether face validity was related to different age groups and levels of CI. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to test the differences of concurrent validity, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability coefficients of each pain scale among the four groups. RESULTS: Regarding face validity, the FPS was ranked best as nearly half of the patients selected it as both the most preferred and simplest scale and it had low errors; the VDS and the NRS were ranked following the FPS; however, the BS-21 and the CAS were ranked last. The concurrent validity, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability of all five pain scales were supported in use with the four groups. The differences in psychometric properties among the four groups were only found in face validity and test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: The findings support the psychometric properties of all five pain scales for pain assessment in Chinese adults including elderly with mild CI. However, the FPS appears to be the best, followed by the VDS and the NRS.
Authors: Mark P Jensen; Catarina Tomé-Pires; Rocío de la Vega; Santiago Galán; Ester Solé; Jordi Miró Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Reham M Baamer; Ayesha Iqbal; Dileep N Lobo; Roger D Knaggs; Nicholas A Levy; Li S Toh Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 11.719
Authors: Anupa Pathak; Saurab Sharma; Allen W Heinemann; Paul W Stratford; Daniel Cury Ribeiro; J Haxby Abbott Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 3.440