Literature DB >> 2081707

Ultrastructure of the periosteum from membrane bone.

C A Squier1, S Ghoneim, C R Kremenak.   

Abstract

Specimens of skull and palate were taken from 7 beagle dogs after perfusion and the periosteum examined by light and electron microscopy. Three zones were evident in the periosteum, differing in terms of the proportion of cells, fibres and matrix. Zone I consisted of osteoblasts adjacent to the bone surface and a supraosteoblast layer of smaller, compact cells, Zone II was a relatively translucent zone with numerous capillaries and Zone III consisted of cells intermingled with collagen fibrils. Quantification of the relative volumes of tissue components using stereology indicated significant differences between the three zones in each bony site, but not between the two sites. Measurement of numerical density, surface density, profile cross-sectional area, cell volume and cell surface/volume ratio of fibroblast-like cells revealed marked differences between these cells in Zone I and the other two zones; it is possible that the fibroblast-like cells seen in Zone I represent osteoprogenitor cells. Zone II represents the classical cambial layer and contains the majority of the vascular elements present in the periosteum. Zone III contains large volumes of fibroblasts and collagen fibrils and corresponds to the classical fibrous layer. The similarity of this zonal organisation in different regions suggests that periosteum has a consistent structure in membrane bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2081707      PMCID: PMC1257144     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  19 in total

1.  The ultrastructure of bone.

Authors:  M E Holtrop
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.256

2.  Correlated morphometric and biochemical analysis of gingival tissue. Morphometric model, tissue sampling and test of stereologic procedures.

Authors:  H E Schroeder; S Münzel-Pedrazzoli
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  The use of free periosteum for bone formation in congenital clefts of the maxilla. A preliminary report.

Authors:  V Ritsilä; S Alhopuro; U Gylling; A Rintala
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1972

4.  Response of the cellular phase of the skeleton to trauma.

Authors:  E A Tonna
Journal:  Periodontics       Date:  1966 May-Jun

5.  The use of periosteal flaps in the repair of clefts of the primary palate.

Authors:  T Skoog
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1965-10

6.  Observations on the ultrastructure of the pericranium.

Authors:  M B Habal; J E Maniscalco
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Palatal periosteal response to surgical trauma.

Authors:  W B Barro; R A Latham
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Stereology of inflammatory connective tissue infiltrates in oral mucosa.

Authors:  W Müller
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Revascularized periosteal grafts--a new method to produce functional new bone without bone grafting.

Authors:  J M Finley; R D Acland; M B Wood
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Two-stage closure of cleft palate (progress report).

Authors:  M A Perko
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1979-02
View more
  40 in total

1.  The effect of mesenchymal stem cells delivered via hydrogel-based tissue engineered periosteum on bone allograft healing.

Authors:  Michael D Hoffman; Chao Xie; Xinping Zhang; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Periosteum mechanobiology and mechanistic insights for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Nicole Y C Yu; Iman Jalilian; André F Pereira; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-11-30

3.  Emulating native periosteum cell population and subsequent paracrine factor production to promote tissue engineered periosteum-mediated allograft healing.

Authors:  Michael D Hoffman; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 5.  Periosteum: characteristic imaging findings with emphasis on radiologic-pathologic comparisons.

Authors:  Damien Bisseret; Rachid Kaci; Marie-Hélène Lafage-Proust; Marianne Alison; Caroline Parlier-Cuau; Jean-Denis Laredo; Valérie Bousson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Gingival recession: its causes and types, and the importance of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Ana Suzy Jati; Laurindo Zanco Furquim; Alberto Consolaro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06

7.  Layer-by-layer nanofiber-enabled engineering of biomimetic periosteum for bone repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Yuankun Zhai; Marc Nuzzo; Xiaochuan Yang; Yunpeng Yang; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Structural and cellular features in metaphyseal and diaphyseal periosteum of osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Stefan A W Bouwense; Ross Crawford; Yin Xiao
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.611

9.  Periosteal cells are a major source of soft callus in bone fracture.

Authors:  Hiroki Murao; Koji Yamamoto; Shuichi Matsuda; Haruhiko Akiyama
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  The periosteum: what is it, where is it, and what mimics it in its absence?

Authors:  Jerry R Dwek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.