Literature DB >> 20816987

Power law distribution defines structural disorder as a structural element directly linked with function.

Peter Tompa1, Lajos Kalmar.   

Abstract

Although intrinsically disordered proteins are prevalent and functionally important, it has never been asked whether structural disorder should be considered as a separate structural category on its own or merely as a lack of secondary and/or tertiary structure. We address this issue by showing that its length distribution in the human proteome follows a power law, with many short regions but also a significant incidence of very long disordered regions. This behavior is in sharp contrast with that of conventional secondary structural elements and is highly reminiscent of the distribution of tertiary structural units in proteins. We interpret this finding by the direct functional involvement of disorder, which distinguishes it from secondary structural elements and endows it with tertiary structural attributes.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816987     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  15 in total

1.  Expanding the proteome: disordered and alternatively folded proteins.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 2.  Circulating extracellular vesicles and rheumatoid arthritis: a proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Alghamdi; Sultan Abdulmughni Alamry; Sami M Bahlas; Vladimir N Uversky; Elrashdy M Redwan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Classification of intrinsically disordered regions and proteins.

Authors:  Robin van der Lee; Marija Buljan; Benjamin Lang; Robert J Weatheritt; Gary W Daughdrill; A Keith Dunker; Monika Fuxreiter; Julian Gough; Joerg Gsponer; David T Jones; Philip M Kim; Richard W Kriwacki; Christopher J Oldfield; Rohit V Pappu; Peter Tompa; Vladimir N Uversky; Peter E Wright; M Madan Babu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Structural disorder in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Rita Pancsa; Peter Tompa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Markov models of amino acid substitution to study proteins with intrinsically disordered regions.

Authors:  Adam M Szalkowski; Maria Anisimova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Proteome-wide evidence for enhanced positive Darwinian selection within intrinsically disordered regions in proteins.

Authors:  Johan Nilsson; Mats Grahn; Anthony P H Wright
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 7.  Wrecked regulation of intrinsically disordered proteins in diseases: pathogenicity of deregulated regulators.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2014-07-25

Review 8.  The Dark Matter of Biology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ross
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Functional diversity and structural disorder in the human ubiquitination pathway.

Authors:  Pallab Bhowmick; Rita Pancsa; Mainak Guharoy; Peter Tompa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Exon-phase symmetry and intrinsic structural disorder promote modular evolution in the human genome.

Authors:  Eva Schad; Lajos Kalmar; Peter Tompa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.