Literature DB >> 20816977

Plumage patterns are good indicators of taxonomic diversity, but not of phylogenetic affinities, in Australian grasswrens Amytornis (Aves: Maluridae).

Les Christidis1, Frank E Rheindt, Walter E Boles, Janette A Norman.   

Abstract

The grasswrens (Maluridae: Amytornis) are elusive songbirds from the arid zones of Australia. Although some other Australian bird genera are also largely restricted to arid regions, none show the level of localized taxonomic diversity seen in Amytornis. Furthermore, their cryptic plumage patterns provide excellent camouflage but make it difficult to determine whether shared patterns reflect phylogenetic relationships or adaptations to similar terrain. To resolve the systematics and patterns of ecological diversification within Amytornis, we here present the results of a phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear multi-locus data for all recognized species and most subspecies, using traditional concatenation-based methods as well as a coalescent-based species-tree approach. Phylogenetic patterns retrieved by the species-tree approach were highly congruent with traditional methods, although branch support was generally higher in concatenation-based analysis, suggesting that species-tree methods may furnish more conservative results. In terms of identifying taxonomic diversity there was good concordance between plumage-based assessments and DNA distances. The same concordance was not found when comparing plumage-based and DNA-based predictions of phylogenetic relationships. Four primary lineages were identified: (a) barbatus; (b) merrotsyi; (c) the textilis complex, purnelli, ballarae, goyderi and housei; and (d) woodwardi, dorotheae, and the striatus complex. There was no robust resolution of relationships between lineages. It appears that in Amytornis, plumage differentiation between discrete populations is taxonomically significant, and not greatly influenced by ecophenotypic variation. However, at the deeper phylogenetic level, similar suites of plumage characters may be phylogenetically uninformative because of homoplasy. The study reveals higher levels of taxonomic diversity in Amytornis than previously recognized, with many taxa being highly localized. Such extensive short range endemism is mainly encountered in poorly-dispersing invertebrates and is unique in Australian birds. The identification here of the additional restricted range taxa has important conservation implications.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816977     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  6 in total

1.  Evolution in Australasian mangrove forests: multilocus phylogenetic analysis of the Gerygone warblers (Aves: Acanthizidae).

Authors:  Árpád S Nyári; Leo Joseph
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effects of mitochondrial DNA rate variation on reconstruction of Pleistocene demographic history in a social avian species, Pomatostomus superciliosus.

Authors:  Janette A Norman; Caroline J Blackmore; Meaghan Rourke; Les Christidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Accurate phylogenetic tree reconstruction from quartets: a heuristic approach.

Authors:  Rezwana Reaz; Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid; M Sohel Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ecological opportunity and the evolution of habitat preferences in an arid-zone bird: implications for speciation in a climate-modified landscape.

Authors:  Janette A Norman; Les Christidis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Young relicts and old relicts: a novel palaeoendemic vertebrate from the Australian Central Uplands.

Authors:  Paul M Oliver; Peter J McDonald
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  The living heart: Climate gradients predict desert mountain endemism.

Authors:  Peter J McDonald; Peter Jobson; Frank Köhler; Catherine E M Nano; Paul M Oliver
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.