Literature DB >> 20816887

Interactions between gaze-centered and allocentric representations of reach target location in the presence of spatial updating.

Patrick A Byrne1, David C Cappadocia, J Douglas Crawford.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have investigated the phenomenon of egocentric spatial updating in gaze-centered coordinates, and some have studied the use of allocentric cues in visually-guided movement, but it is not known how these two mechanisms interact. Here, we tested whether gaze-centered and allocentric information combine at the time of viewing the target, or if the brain waits until the last possible moment. To do this, we took advantage of the well-known fact that pointing and reaching movements show gaze-centered 'retinal magnification' errors (RME) that update across saccades. During gaze fixation, we found that visual landmarks, and hence allocentric information, reduces RME for targets in the left visual hemifield but not in the right. When a saccade was made between viewing and reaching, this landmark-induced reduction in RME only depended on gaze at reach, not at encoding. Based on this finding, we argue that egocentric-allocentric combination occurs after the intervening saccade. This is consistent with previous findings in healthy and brain damaged subjects suggesting that the brain updates early spatial representations during eye movement and combines them at the time of action.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816887     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  No effect of delay on the spatial representation of serial reach targets.

Authors:  Immo Schütz; Denise Y P Henriques; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A State Space Model for Spatial Updating of Remembered Visual Targets during Eye Movements.

Authors:  Yalda Mohsenzadeh; Suryadeep Dash; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-12

5.  Automatic representation of a visual stimulus relative to a background in the right precuneus.

Authors:  Motoaki Uchimura; Tamami Nakano; Yusuke Morito; Hiroshi Ando; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  Are All Spatial Reference Frames Egocentric? Reinterpreting Evidence for Allocentric, Object-Centered, or World-Centered Reference Frames.

Authors:  Flavia Filimon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Cortical Activation during Landmark-Centered vs. Gaze-Centered Memory of Saccade Targets in the Human: An FMRI Study.

Authors:  Ying Chen; J D Crawford
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23

8.  A modular theory of multisensory integration for motor control.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Integration of egocentric and allocentric information during memory-guided reaching to images of a natural environment.

Authors:  Katja Fiehler; Christian Wolf; Mathias Klinghammer; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.