Literature DB >> 20816627

ACR Appropriateness Criteria on colorectal cancer screening.

Judy Yee1, Max Paul Rosen, Michael A Blake, Mark E Baker, Brooks D Cash, Jeff L Fidler, Thomas H Grant, Frederick L Greene, Bronwyn Jones, Douglas S Katz, Tasneem Lalani, Frank H Miller, William C Small, Gary S Sudakoff, David M Warshauer.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer remains one of the most common causes of cancer death in this country. This malignancy is ideally suited for screening because the detection and removal of the precursor adenomatous polyp can prevent most colorectal cancers from ever forming. The choice of a test for screening involves consideration of various individual parameters, including patient age and the presence of risk factors for the development of colorectal cancer. Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) has emerged as the leading imaging technique for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals on the basis of the evidence presented in this paper. The double-contrast barium enema is an alternative imaging test that is appropriate particularly when CTC is not available. In 2008, the American Cancer Society guideline for colorectal cancer screening was revised jointly with the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the ACR to include CTC every 5 years as an option for average-risk individuals. Computed tomographic colonography is also the preferred test for colon evaluation after an incomplete colonoscopy. Imaging tests including CTC and the double-contrast barium enema are usually not indicated for colorectal cancer screening in high-risk patients with polyposis syndromes or inflammatory bowel disease. This paper presents the new colorectal cancer imaging test ratings and is the result of evidence-based consensus by the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816627     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  5 in total

1.  PillCam Colon 2 capsule in patients unable or unwilling to undergo colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lucian Negreanu; Ruxandra Babiuc; Andreea Bengus; Roxana Sadagurschi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-11-16

Review 2.  Suspected extracolonic neoplasms detected on CT colonography: literature review and possible outcomes.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Carolyn M Rutter; Abraham H Dachman; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Trends and Determinants of Up-to-date Status with Colorectal Cancer Screening in Tennessee, 2002-2008.

Authors:  Sreenivas P Veeranki; Shimin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-07

4.  Advances in CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Judy Yee; Stefanie Weinstein; Tara Morgan; Patrick Alore; Rizwan Aslam
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.