Literature DB >> 20816592

Percutaneous treatment for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts: Long-term results in a single center.

Enver Zerem1, Goran Imamović, Safet Omerović, Farid Ljuca, Bahrija Haracić.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to present and evaluate the long-term results of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts (PPC).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 128 patients with 140 PPC treated by PCD from 01/01/1989 to 12/31/2008. All procedures were performed under ultrasound control. Surgical treatment was planned only in patients with failed PCD. The patients were followed up monthly with sonography for 12 months. The primary outcome was conversion rate to surgery. Secondary outcomes were disappearance of PPC, requirement for additional treatment, length of hospital stay, and catheter dwell time.
RESULTS: During the follow-up, 42 of the 140 cysts (30%) recurred. 19/42 cysts were small and they were followed up without intervention and 23/42 cysts required further intervention. These patients were offered a second attempt but 5 patients declined it and they chose to undergo surgery. The remaining 18 patients underwent second PCD and 10 of them developed recurrence. All of them underwent third PCD and 6 of the 10 patients developed recurrences. Four and 2 of them necessitated surgery and follow-up, respectively. In total, 9 of the 128 patients (7%) underwent surgery during the study period. Medians (interquartile ranges) of hospital stay and catheter dwell time were 19 (14-23) and 23 (15-43) days, respectively. There were no complications related to the procedure.
CONCLUSION: PCD is a safe and effective management for PPC, with low recurrence rates and complication rate and it can eliminate the need for surgery in majority of patients with PPC. Copyright (c) 2010 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816592     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Intern Med        ISSN: 0953-6205            Impact factor:   4.487


  8 in total

1.  What is the optimal treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections?

Authors:  Enver Zerem; Alma Sušić; Nada Pavlović-Čalić; Bahrija Haračić; Predrag Jovanović
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Is irrigation necessary during endoscopic necrosectomy of pancreatic necroses?

Authors:  Enver Zerem; Goran Imamović; Zoran Mavija
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comments on the article about the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  Enver Zerem; Safet Omerović
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Enver Zerem; Goran Hauser; Svjetlana Loga-Zec; Suad Kunosić; Predrag Jovanović; Dino Crnkić
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Treatment of severe acute pancreatitis and its complications.

Authors:  Enver Zerem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Evidence-based management of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  Diana A Whitehead; Timothy B Gardner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09

7.  Clinical study on cystogastrostomy and Roux-en-Y-type cystojejunostomy in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Jun Ye; Lan Wang; Shan Lu; Dujiang Yang; Weiming Hu; Huimin Lu; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Role of Clinical, Biochemical, and Imaging Parameters in predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Dina Zerem; Omar Zerem; Enver Zerem
Journal:  Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.