Literature DB >> 20816303

Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.

Natalie Reznikov1, Gilad Har-Zion, Idit Barkana, Yossi Abed, Meir Redlich.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we assessed the friction forces between various self-ligating brackets and stainless steel orthodontic wires, subjected to different shear and bending forces in the buccolingual plane.
METHODS: Three kinds of self-ligating brackets and 2 kinds of ligated controls were tested in a newly developed in-vitro system. Friction was tested with stainless steel orthodontic wire in 3 deflection states. The Bonferroni multiple comparisons test was applied to evaluate intergroup differences (P <0.05). Wire samples were examined with a scanning electron microscope before and after sliding.
RESULTS: The results showed significant intergroup differences in friction resistance in response to wire deflection. In nonzero buccolingual deflections, passive self-ligating brackets developed higher friction forces, comparable with those in the conventional elastic ligation control group. The control brackets with reduced friction ligature had considerably lower friction forces than any other group. The active self-ligating bracket ranked between the self-ligating brackets and the reduced friction ligature group. A tribologic survey showed substantial surface alterations among wire samples coupled with passive self-ligating brackets.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to manufacturers' claims, this study illustrates that, in certain clinical situations, a firm passive bracket clip can have a negative influence on the wire-bracket frictional characteristics. 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816303     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems' Kinetic Friction: Conventional and Self-Ligating.

Authors:  Aurel-Claudiu Vartolomei; Dan-Cosmin Serbanoiu; Dana-Valentina Ghiga; Marioara Moldovan; Stanca Cuc; Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann; Mariana Pacurar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Relationship between friction force and orthodontic force at the leveling stage using a coated wire.

Authors:  Masaki Murayama; Yasuhiro Namura; Takahiko Tamura; Hiroaki Iwai; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Influence of Friction Resistance on Expression of Superelastic Properties of Initial NiTi Wires in "Reduced Friction" and Conventional Bracket Systems.

Authors:  Natalie Reznikov; Gilad Har-Zion; Idit Barkana; Yosef Abed; Meir Redlich
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2009-12-20

4.  Evaluating the Amount of Tooth Movement and Root Resorption during Canine Retraction with Friction versus Frictionless Mechanics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Mohamed Makhlouf; Amr Aboul-Ezz; Mona Salah Fayed; Hend Hafez
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-05

5.  The Influence of Friction on Design of the Type of Bracket and Its Relation to OHRQoL in Patients Who Use Multi-Bracket Appliances: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Adriana González-Sáez; Laura Antonio-Zancajo; Javier Montero; Alberto Albaladejo; María Melo; Daniele Garcovich; Alfonso Alvarado-Lorenzo
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Friction forces during sliding of various brackets for malaligned teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Vito Crincoli; Letizia Perillo; Maria Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Antonio Balsamo; Vitaliano Serpico; Francesco Chiatante; Carmine Pappalettere; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-28

7.  Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions.

Authors:  Sérgio Ricardo Jakob; Davison Matheus; Maria Cristina Jimenez-Pellegrin; Cecília Pedroso Turssi; Flávia Lucisano Botelho Amaral
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

Review 8.  Resistance to sliding in orthodontics: misconception or method error? A systematic review and a proposal of a test protocol.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Aggeliki Papoutsi; Simona Dianiskova; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.