Literature DB >> 20815930

Adequacy and quality of abdominal echographies requested by primary care professionals.

Ma Antònia Auladell1, Llorenç Caballeria, Guillem Pera, Lluís Rodríguez, José Dario Casas, Jesús Aznar, Dolores Miranda, Carmen Sánchez, Antonio Negrete, Josep Ma Castellví, Jesús Bernad, Santiago Canut, Josep Aubà, Miren Maite Aizpurua, Pere Torán.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of abdominal echography in primary care is great because it is innocuous, inexpensive, easy to perform and provides a great deal of information making this the first examination to be requested in cases of probable abdominal disease. However, too many abdominal echographies are probably requested overcrowding the Departments of Radiodiagnosis with not always justified petitions or with repetition of tests based on little clinical criteria. METHODS/
DESIGN: The aim of the study is to evaluate the adequacy and quality of abdominal echographies requested by primary care physicians in the Maresme County (North of Barcelona), develop guidelines for indicating echographies and reevaluate this adequacy after implementing these guidelines.We will perform a two-phase study: the first descriptive, and retrospective evaluating the adequacy and quality of petitions for abdominal echographies, and in the second phase we will evaluate the impact of recommendations for indicating abdominal echographies for PC physicians on the adequacy and quality of echography petitions thereafter.This study will be carried out in 10 primary care centres in the Maresme (Barcelona).1067 abdominal echographies requested by primary care physicians from the above mentioned centres from January 2007 to April 2010 and referred to the Department of Radiology and the same number of applications after the intervention.All the petitions for abdominal echographies requested will be analysed and the clinical histories will be obtained to determine demographic variables, the reason for the visit and for the echography petition and diagnostic orientation, clinical and echographic data, evaluation of the echographies according to the quality and variables characterising the professionals requesting the echographies including: age, sex, laboral situation, length of time in work post, formation, etc.To achieve a consensus of the adequacy of abdominal echography, a work group including gastroenterologists, radiologists and general practitioners will be created following the nominal group. This will allow the design of guidelines for the indication of abdominal echography and posterior evaluation of their impact among physicians by diffusion and posterior reevaluation of the adequacy of the petitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20815930      PMCID: PMC2940929          DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   3.067


  17 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasonography of the acute abdomen: gastrointestinal conditions.

Authors:  Julien B C M Puylaert
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Brief report: Use and misuse of thyroid ultrasound in the initial workup of patients with suspected thyroid problems referred by primary care physicians to an endocrine clinic.

Authors:  Yair Liel; Nitay Fraenkel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Assessment of the appropriateness of requested radiological examinations for outpatients and the potential financial consequences of guideline application.

Authors:  I Van Breuseghem; E Geusens
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

4.  Upper abdominal ultrasound in general practice: indications, diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management.

Authors:  Anouk M Speets; Arno W Hoes; Yolanda van der Graaf; Sandra Kalmijn; Niek J de Wit; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Jan Willem C Gratama; Matthieu J C M Rutten; Willem P T H M Mali
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Sustained complete response and complications rates after radiofrequency ablation of very early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Is resection still the treatment of choice?

Authors:  Tito Livraghi; Franca Meloni; Michele Di Stasi; Emanuela Rolle; Luigi Solbiati; Carmine Tinelli; Sandro Rossi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  The Gatekeeper and the Wizard: a fairy tale.

Authors:  N Mathers; P Hodgkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-21

7.  Combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations.

Authors:  Stephen N Wong; Chun-Jung Lin; Chen-Chun Lin; Wei-Ting Chen; Ian Homer Y Cua; Shi-Ming Lin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Abdominal ultrasound in the evaluation of the asymptomatic patient with abnormal liver function tests.

Authors:  R F J Browne; S Hamilton
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2004-02

9.  Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Ramón Vilana; Carmen Ayuso; Lluís Bianchi; Manel Solé; Juan Ramón Ayuso; Loreto Boix; Margarita Sala; María Varela; Josep M Llovet; Concepció Brú; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Prevalence and factors associated with the presence of non alcoholic fatty liver disease in an apparently healthy adult population in primary care units.

Authors:  Llorenç Caballería; Ma Antonia Auladell; Pere Torán; Dolores Miranda; Jesús Aznar; Guillem Pera; Dolors Gil; Laura Muñoz; Jaume Planas; Santiago Canut; Jesús Bernad; Josep Aubà; Gregorio Pizarro; Miren Maite Aizpurua; Anna Altaba; Albert Tibau
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  1 in total

1.  The justification of non-obstetric ultrasound referrals: A safe and effective practice.

Authors:  Shaunna Smith; Trevor Parker; Pamela Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-04-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.