Literature DB >> 2081531

Characterization and histochemical localization of the rat intestinal Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporter by monoclonal antibodies.

W Haase1, K Heitmann, W Friese, D Ollig, H Koepsell.   

Abstract

The localization of the Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporter in rat small intestine was investigated with four monoclonal antibodies which were raised against porcine renal brush-border membrane proteins. The antibodies alter high affinity phlorizin binding or Na+ gradient-dependent D-glucose uptake in kidney and intestine. In both organs, the antibodies react with polypeptides with apparent molecular weights of 75,000 and 47,000. In pig kidney, these polypeptides were identified as components of the Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporter (Koepsell, H., K. Korn, A. Raszeja-Specht, S. Bernotat-Danielowski, D. Ollig, J. Biol. Chem. 263, 18419-18429 (1988)). The electron microscopic localization of antibody binding was investigated by immunogold labeling of ultrathin plastic sections. In villi and crypts of duodenum, jejunum and ileum the antibodies bound specifically to brush-border membranes of enterocytes and did not react with the basolateral membranes. The density of antigenic sites in brush-border membranes was highest in jejunum, intermediate in ileum and lowest in duodenum. On the tip, the middle and the basis of the villi the density of antigenic sites was similar. The data demonstrate homologous Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporters in kidney and intestine. They suggest that during maturation of the enterocytes when the total area of brush-border membrane increases, the concentration of the Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporter in the brush-border membrane remains constant. However, we found that different segments of small intestine not only contain different surface areas of the transporter-containing brush-border membrane per intestinal length but also different densities of the transporter within the brush-border membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2081531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0171-9335            Impact factor:   4.492


  8 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical localization of Na(+)-dependent glucose transporter in rat jejunum.

Authors:  K Takata; T Kasahara; M Kasahara; O Ezaki; H Hirano
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Glucose transporters in the small intestine in health and disease.

Authors:  Hermann Koepsell
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 3.  Function and presumed molecular structure of Na(+)-D-glucose cotransport systems.

Authors:  H Koepsell; J Spangenberg
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  The regulation of GLUT5 and GLUT2 activity in the adaptation of intestinal brush-border fructose transport in diabetes.

Authors:  C P Corpe; M M Basaleh; J Affleck; G Gould; T J Jess; G L Kellett
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 5.  Sodium glucose cotransporter SGLT1 as a therapeutic target in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Panai Song; Akira Onishi; Hermann Koepsell; Volker Vallon
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 6.902

6.  Gradient for D-glucose and linoleic acid uptake along the crypt-villus axis of rabbit jejunal brush border membrane vesicles.

Authors:  R J Fingerote; K A Doring; A B Thomson
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.880

7.  Localizations of Na(+)-D-glucose cotransporters SGLT1 and SGLT2 in human kidney and of SGLT1 in human small intestine, liver, lung, and heart.

Authors:  Ivana Vrhovac; Daniela Balen Eror; Dirk Klessen; Christa Burger; Davorka Breljak; Ognjen Kraus; Nikola Radović; Stipe Jadrijević; Ivan Aleksic; Thorsten Walles; Christoph Sauvant; Ivan Sabolić; Hermann Koepsell
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Expression profiling and immunolocalization of Na+-D-glucose-cotransporter 1 in mice employing knockout mice as specificity control indicate novel locations and differences between mice and rats.

Authors:  Ivana Vrhovac Madunić; Davorka Breljak; Dean Karaica; Hermann Koepsell; Ivan Sabolić
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.657

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.