Literature DB >> 20814796

[Evaluation of new technologies by residents and staff in an institutional setting. Findings of the BETAGT project].

K Classen1, F Oswald, H-W Wahl, C Heusel, P Antfang, C Becker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the substudy that was conducted as part of the project "Bewertung neuer Technologien durch Bewohner und Personal im Altenzentrum Grafenau der Paul Wilhelm von Keppler-Stiftung und Prüfung des Transfers ins häusliche Wohnen" (BETAGT) was to have residents and staff members in nursing homes with limited technological equipment complete a questionnaire about their life-long technological experiences and their general technological attitude. Furthermore, specific technological devices and systems were evaluated in terms of their potential with respect to safety, privacy, or help in decreasing burden. Data were collected using a newly developed brief questionnaire. SAMPLE AND METHODS: A total of 84 residents and 109 staff members sampled from 11 different institutions were asked about their life-long technology experiences, general attitudes towards technology as well as attitudes towards specific technological devices. Residents' opinions were assessed via brief structured interviews; a structured questionnaire was given to the staff members to complete. The technological devices to be evaluated were introduced via pictured descriptions.
RESULTS: Residents and staff members showed a positive attitude towards technology. With regard to the potential of new technologies, residents and staff members expect different effects on several dimensions of quality of life. Both groups rated the potential of the dimension of safety to be highest.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to widely held opinion, older adults living in institutions do not, in general, seem to be too critical about new technology. From the staff members' point of view, modern technology can be integrated into daily care routines of a nursing home, but the potentials of new technologies are considered in a very differential manner.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20814796     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-010-0126-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  3 in total

Review 1.  Psychological principles of successful aging technologies: a mini-review.

Authors:  Ulman Lindenberger; Martin Lövdén; Michael Schellenbach; Shu-Chen Li; Antonio Krüger
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 5.140

2.  [Technology in residences for support of a self-determined life style for the elderly. The research project "sentha" and initial results of a social science project].

Authors:  H Mollenkopf; S Meyer; E Schulze; S Wurm; W Friesdorf
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  Risk factor characteristics in carers who physically abuse or neglect their elderly dependants.

Authors:  A M Reay; K D Browne
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.658

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Willingness to accept an Internet-based mobility platform in different age cohorts. Empiric results of the project S-Mobil 100].

Authors:  J Beil; V Cihlar; A Kruse
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Intelligent Systems For Assessing Aging Changes: home-based, unobtrusive, and continuous assessment of aging.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kaye; Shoshana A Maxwell; Nora Mattek; Tamara L Hayes; Hiroko Dodge; Misha Pavel; Holly B Jimison; Katherine Wild; Linda Boise; Tracy A Zitzelberger
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 3.  [Gerontology, geriatric medicine and robot research : Look back to the future].

Authors:  Hans-Werner Wahl; L Cornelius Bollheimer
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 1.281

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.