Literature DB >> 20814286

Subepineurial injection in ultrasound-guided interscalene needle tip placement.

Steven L Orebaugh1, Kathryn McFadden, Havyn Skorupan, Paul E Bigeleisen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The neural elements of the brachial plexus between the anterior and middle scalene muscles are readily visible by ultrasound. However, the epineurium of these nerve structures is difficult to discern on ultrasound imaging because of the proximity of the scalene muscles to the nerve elements, and this may lead to unintentional subepineurial injection (SEI). To evaluate whether typical needle tip placement under ultrasound guidance results in SEI, as opposed to extraneural injection, we undertook this cadaver study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six nonpreserved cadavers served as subjects for 10 injections. After imaging revealed the hypoechoic fascicles of the brachial plexus at the interscalene level, the tip of a 22-gauge, 5-cm short-bevel needle was inserted into a position adjacent to one of the fascicles by ultrasound guidance. At this point, 0.1 to 0.2 mL of india ink solution was injected. The brachial plexus at this level was then dissected and removed. The nerve elements discolored by the ink were removed, fixed, and stained for histologic analysis and were then examined for evidence of subepineurial ink deposition. Four nerve segments, which were unaffected by the injected ink, served as controls. These were subjected to topical india ink application for a 60-min period and were then washed, fixed, and stained for histologic analysis.
RESULTS: In all 10 interscalene sites, ultrasonography revealed multiple hypoechoic nodules that could be traced proximally to the spine, as in live subjects. On gross analysis after dissection, the superficial nerve elements of the brachial plexus appeared to be stained by the ink. On histologic examination, 5 of 10 nerve specimens revealed ink within the epineurium (subepineurial), whereas in the other 5, it had not penetrated this barrier. The india ink did not penetrate the perineurium in any of the specimens. Among control specimens, none had evidence of subepineurial ink.
CONCLUSIONS: In a cadaver model of needle tip placement for ultrasound-guided interscalene block, we found that SEI occurred more frequently than expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20814286     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181e859f0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  5 in total

1.  An improvised pressure gauge for regional nerve blockade/anesthesia injections: an initial study.

Authors:  Jayaprakash Patil; Hari Ankireddy; Antony Wilkes; David Williams; Michael Lim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The impact of local anesthetic distribution on block onset in ultrasound-guided interscalene block.

Authors:  R S Lang; M L Kentor; M Vallejo; P Bigeleisen; S R Wisniewski; S L Orebaugh
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 3.  [Ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia : placement and dosage of local anesthetics].

Authors:  G Gorsewski; A Dinse-Lambracht; I Tugtekin; A Gauss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Basavaraja Ayyanagouda; Vinod Hosalli; Prableen Kaur; Uday Ambi; S Y Hulkund
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05

5.  Extraplexus versus intraplexus ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Monica W Harbell; Kerstin Kolodzie; Matthias Behrends; C Benjamin Ma; Sakura Kinjo; Edward Yap; Matthias R Braehler; Pedram Aleshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.