BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: ESRD has an adverse impact on patients who have had previous nonrenal solid-organ transplants (NRTxs; liver, heart, lung) and may be referred for a kidney transplant (KTx). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for all KTx candidates who had NRTx and were listed between 1995 and 2008, incidence of NRTx listings were compared with trends in KTx without NRTX. The efficacy of kidney transplantation relative to dialysis was measured in time-dependent Cox models that incorporated candidates with the applicable previous organ transplant as a reference group. RESULTS: Overall, 4904 NRTx candidates were listed during the study period, growing from <1% of candidates before 1995 to 3.3% in 2008. A total of 38% of NRTx candidates were listed preemptively versus 21% of other candidates. NRTx candidates had dramatically shorter half-lives (≤ 4 years) after listing compared with previous KTx recipients (9.2 years). KTx demonstrated a survival advantage for each type of NRTx candidate relative to maintenance dialysis. Listing for expanded-criteria donor kidneys averaged 47% and did not differ significantly by previous transplant category. CONCLUSIONS: KTx candidates who are placed on the waiting list after NRTx constitute a significant and more rapidly growing cohort compared with the general KTx candidate population. NRTx candidates are frequently listed preemptively but have rapid decline once placed on the waiting list. Targeted use of expanded-criteria donor and living-donor transplants in the NRTx population may be particularly important given their high mortality on the waiting list.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:ESRD has an adverse impact on patients who have had previous nonrenal solid-organ transplants (NRTxs; liver, heart, lung) and may be referred for a kidney transplant (KTx). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for all KTx candidates who had NRTx and were listed between 1995 and 2008, incidence of NRTx listings were compared with trends in KTx without NRTX. The efficacy of kidney transplantation relative to dialysis was measured in time-dependent Cox models that incorporated candidates with the applicable previous organ transplant as a reference group. RESULTS: Overall, 4904 NRTx candidates were listed during the study period, growing from <1% of candidates before 1995 to 3.3% in 2008. A total of 38% of NRTx candidates were listed preemptively versus 21% of other candidates. NRTx candidates had dramatically shorter half-lives (≤ 4 years) after listing compared with previous KTx recipients (9.2 years). KTx demonstrated a survival advantage for each type of NRTx candidate relative to maintenance dialysis. Listing for expanded-criteria donor kidneys averaged 47% and did not differ significantly by previous transplant category. CONCLUSIONS: KTx candidates who are placed on the waiting list after NRTx constitute a significant and more rapidly growing cohort compared with the general KTx candidate population. NRTx candidates are frequently listed preemptively but have rapid decline once placed on the waiting list. Targeted use of expanded-criteria donor and living-donor transplants in the NRTx population may be particularly important given their high mortality on the waiting list.
Authors: James R Cassuto; Peter P Reese; Peter Reese; Roy D Bloom; Alden Doyle; Simin Goral; Ali Naji; Peter L Abt Journal: Transplantation Date: 2010-02-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Robert M Merion; Valarie B Ashby; Robert A Wolfe; Dale A Distant; Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon; Robert A Metzger; Akinlolu O Ojo; Friedrich K Port Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-12-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: H U Meier-Kriesche; F K Port; A O Ojo; S M Rudich; J A Hanson; D M Cibrik; A B Leichtman; B Kaplan Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: C M Coopersmith; D C Brennan; B Miller; C Wang; P Hmiel; S Shenoy; V Ramachandran; M D Jendrisak; C S Ceriotti; T Mohanakumar; J A Lowell Journal: Surgery Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: T M Egan; S Murray; R T Bustami; T H Shearon; K P McCullough; L B Edwards; M A Coke; E R Garrity; S C Sweet; D A Heiney; F L Grover Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Victor I Machicao; Titte R Srinivas; Alan W Hemming; Consuelo Soldevila-Pico; Roberto J Firpi; Alan I Reed; Giuseppi J Morelli; David R Nelson; Manal F Abdelmalek Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Akinlolu O Ojo; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port; Robert A Wolfe; Alan B Leichtman; Eric W Young; Julie Arndorfer; Laura Christensen; Robert M Merion Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James R Cassuto; Matthew H Levine; Peter P Reese; Roy D Bloom; Simin Goral; Ali Naji; Peter L Abt Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Claire Francoz; François Durand; Jeffrey A Kahn; Yuri S Genyk; Mitra K Nadim Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Michael J Eerhart; José A Reyes; Glen E Leverson; Juan S Danobeitia; Casi L Blanton; Laura J Zitur; Peter J Chlebeck; Luis A Fernandez Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 5.385