Literature DB >> 20813807

Embryo and uterine influences on IVF outcomes: an analysis of a UK multi-centre cohort.

S A Roberts1, W M Hirst, D R Brison, A Vail.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to optimize IVF strategies, particularly with the use of single embryo transfer, good predictive models are required. Here, we develop a model to allow such prediction, and the structure of the models point to more general conclusions about the mode of action of prognostic factors.
METHODS: Anonymized data from consecutive embryo transfers in five IVF centres in the UK for the 2000-2005 period were extracted and the morphological grade based on common scoring criteria was included. There were 16 096 (12 487 fresh and 3609 frozen) transfers, for 8775 couples, available for analysis. Live birth data were fitted to a model with separate sub-models for embryo and recipient effects [the 'Embryo-Uterus' (EU) model]. All covariates were included, with sub-model selection using Akaike's information criterion.
RESULTS: Age, number of embryos created, attempt number, previous history of pregnancy, duration of infertility, day of transfer and tubal diagnosis were all identified as significant prognostic factors, along with embryo grade and growth rate. Frozen transfers were substantially less likely to lead to a live birth with odds ratios of 1/3 to 1/2 compared with fresh transfers, with no evidence of differential loss for any particular patient group. Age acts predominantly through the embryo component with only a weak effect on the uterus. The embryo number, attempt number, previous pregnancies and duration of infertility act predominantly through the uterine environment. Both sub-models show significant heterogeneity between centres.
CONCLUSIONS: The EU modelling framework has generated a model for predicting outcomes of embryo-transfer procedures, subject to the limitations of routinely collected data. With this large data set, the model allows identification of factors that act specifically on embryo viability or maternal receptivity. Variability in the two components between centres with similar overall outcomes suggests scope for further optimization of IVF treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813807     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  12 in total

1.  Can Ratios Between Prognostic Factors Predict the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in an IVF/ICSI Program with a GnRH Agonist-FSH/hMG Protocol? An Assessment of 2421 Embryo Transfers, and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Michel Menard; Rosalie Cabry; Florence Scheffler; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Marie-Thérèse Le Martelot; Sylvie Roche; Jean-Jacques Chabaud; Henri Copin; Hortense Drapier; Moncef Benkhalifa; Damien Beauvillard
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Predictors of treatment failure in young patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Marni B Jacobs; Hillary Klonoff-Cohen; Sanjay Agarwal; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Suzanne Lindsay; V Gabriel Garzo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The combination of platelet count and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio is a predictive factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji-Feng Feng; Ying Huang; Qi-Xun Chen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  Chromatin Protamination and Catsper Expression in Spermatozoa Predict Clinical Outcomes after Assisted Reproduction Programs.

Authors:  S Marchiani; L Tamburrino; F Benini; L Fanfani; R Dolce; G Rastrelli; M Maggi; S Pellegrini; E Baldi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The effects of acupuncture on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheng-Yun Xie; Zhi-Hang Peng; Bing Yao; Li Chen; Yan-Yun Mu; Jie Cheng; Qian Li; Xi Luo; Peng-Yan Yang; You-Bing Xia
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.659

6.  Factors Associated with In Vitro Fertilization Live Birth Outcome: A Comparison of Different Classification Methods.

Authors:  Payam Amini; Fariba Ramezanali; Mahta Parchehbaf-Kashani; Saman Maroufizadeh; Reza Omani-Samani; Azadeh Ghaheri
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-03-11

7.  Individualized embryo selection strategy developed by stacking machine learning model for better in vitro fertilization outcomes: an application study.

Authors:  Qingsong Xi; Qiyu Yang; Meng Wang; Bo Huang; Bo Zhang; Zhou Li; Shuai Liu; Liu Yang; Lixia Zhu; Lei Jin
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Development and Validation of a Clinical Pregnancy Failure Prediction Model for Poor Ovarian Responders During IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Fangyuan Li; Ruihui Lu; Cheng Zeng; Xin Li; Qing Xue
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Does the number of oocytes retrieved influence pregnancy after fresh embryo transfer?

Authors:  Qianfang Cai; Fei Wan; Kai Huang; Hanwang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Using Bonferroni, BIC and AIC to assess evidence for alternative biological pathways: covariate selection for the multilevel Embryo-Uterus model.

Authors:  Christos Stylianou; Andrew Pickles; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.