Literature DB >> 20813587

Microscopic-observation drug susceptibility and thin layer agar assays for the detection of drug resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jessica Minion1, Erika Leung, Dick Menzies, Madhukar Pai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simple, rapid, and affordable tests are needed to detect drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the accuracy of microscopic-observation drug susceptibility (MODS) and thin layer agar (TLA) assays for rapid screening of patients at risk of drug-resistant tuberculosis.
METHODS: In accordance with protocols and methods recommended by the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Biosis for reports published between January, 1990, and February, 2009. We included studies investigating detection of drug resistance in M tuberculosis with the MODS or TLA assay, and in which an accepted reference standard was used. Data extracted from the studies were combined by use of bivariate random-effects regression models and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves to estimate sensitivity and specificity for detection of resistance to specific drugs.
FINDINGS: We identified 12 studies, of which nine investigated the MODS assay and three investigated the TLA assay. For the MODS assay of rifampicin resistance, pooled estimates were 98·0% (95% CI 94·5-99·3) for sensitivity and 99·4% (95·7-99·9) for specificity. For the MODS assay of isoniazid resistance with a 0·1 μg/mL cutoff, pooled sensitivity was 97·7% (94·4-99·1) and pooled specificity was 95·8% (88·1-98·6), but with a 0·4 μg/mL cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 90·0% (84·5-93·7) and specificity increased to 98·6% (96·9-99·4). All assessments of rifampicin and isoniazid resistance with the TLA assay yielded 100% accuracy. Mean turnaround time was 9·9 days (95% CI 4·1-15·8) for the MODS assay and 11·1 days (10·1-12·0) for the TLA assay.
INTERPRETATION: MODS and TLA assays are inexpensive, rapid alternatives to conventional methods for drug susceptibility testing of M tuberculosis. Our data and expert opinion informed WHO's recommendation for use of selected non-commercial drug susceptibility tests, including MODS, as an interim solution until capacity for genotypic or automated liquid culture drug susceptibility testing is developed. FUNDING: Stop TB Department of WHO.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813587     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70165-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  35 in total

1.  Local control of pulmonary resistance and lung compliance in the canine lung.

Authors:  R L Coon; C C Rattenborg; J P Kampine
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Promise versus reality: optimism bias in package inserts for tuberculosis diagnostics.

Authors:  Claudia M Denkinger; Jasmine Grenier; Jessica Minion; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  General and advanced diagnostic tools to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their drug susceptibility: a review.

Authors:  Md A Gazi; Md R Islam; Mohammad G Kibria; Z Mahmud
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of WHO-endorsed phenotypic drug susceptibility testing methods for first-line and second-line antituberculosis drugs.

Authors:  David J Horne; Lancelot M Pinto; Matthew Arentz; S-Y Grace Lin; Edward Desmond; Laura L Flores; Karen R Steingart; Jessica Minion
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  RNA signatures allow rapid identification of pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities.

Authors:  Amy K Barczak; James E Gomez; Benjamin B Kaufmann; Ella R Hinson; Lisa Cosimi; Mark L Borowsky; Andrew B Onderdonk; Sarah A Stanley; Devinder Kaur; Kevin F Bryant; David M Knipe; Alexander Sloutsky; Deborah T Hung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  HIV and tuberculosis: a deadly human syndemic.

Authors:  Candice K Kwan; Joel D Ernst
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Methodological and Clinical Aspects of the Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Other Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Tomasz Jagielski; Alina Minias; Jakko van Ingen; Nalin Rastogi; Anna Brzostek; Anna Żaczek; Jarosław Dziadek
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Evaluation of fluoromycobacteriophages for detecting drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Liliana Rondón; Mariana Piuri; William R Jacobs; Jacobus de Waard; Graham F Hatfull; Howard E Takiff
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Advances in Diagnostic Assays for Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Stephen D Lawn
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.915

10.  Second-line drug susceptibility breakpoints for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the MODS assay.

Authors:  A P Trollip; D Moore; J Coronel; L Caviedes; S Klages; T Victor; E Romancenco; V Crudu; K Ajbani; V P Vineet; C Rodrigues; R L Jackson; K Eisenach; R S Garfein; T C Rodwell; E Desmond; E J Groessl; T G Ganiats; A Catanzaro
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.