Literature DB >> 20813411

Moscow eye microsurgery complex in Russia keratoprosthesis in Beijing.

Yifei Huang1, Jifeng Yu, Li Liu, Gaiping Du, Jing Song, Huiling Guo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and preliminary safety of the Moscow Eye Microsurgery Complex in Russia (MICOF) keratoprosthesis in eyes with complicated corneal opacities unsuitable for keratoplasty.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive clinical case series. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 85 eyes of 85 patients who previously underwent MICOF keratoprosthesis implantation at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between April 1, 2000, and August 31, 2009. The mean follow-up after MICOF keratoprosthesis implantation (measured after the second stage of the implantation) was 34.7 months (range, 3-107 months).
METHODS: The MICOF keratoprosthesis surgery involves 2 procedures. In stage 1, a supporting titanium frame is inserted into the lamellar pocket; a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) optical cylinder is implanted 3 months later (stage 2). Data were collected from the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative courses. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors influencing postoperative complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity (VA), keratoprosthesis retention, and significant postoperative complications.
RESULTS: The MICOF keratoprosthesis dramatically improved vision in most patients. The percentage of eyes with postoperative VA of 20/100 or better was 80.7% (67/83) at 6 months after stage 2, 82.4% (61/74) at 1 year, 72.7% (40/55) at 2 years, 78.8% (26/33) at 3 years, 78.9% (15/19) at 4 years, 100% (8/8) at 5 years, 80% (4/5) at 6 years, 100% (2/2) at 7 and 8 years, and 100% (1/1) at 9 years. The most common complication, retroprosthetic membrane formation, occurred in 39 of 85 eyes. The overall keratoprosthesis retention rate was 81.2% at an average follow-up of 34.7 months (range, 3-107 months). Ten eyes presented with elevated intraocular pressure after implantation; 3 of these had underlying glaucoma. All 3 eyes received cyclocryotherapy to control intraocular pressure. Sterile vitreitis occurred in 2 eyes, and retinal detachment occurred in 1 eye.
CONCLUSIONS: The MICOF keratoprosthesis is an effective alternative for patients with corneal blindness and a poor prognosis for penetrating keratoplasty.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813411     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  4 in total

1.  Implantation of Iakymenko keratoprosthesis in patients with severe ocular injury.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Pan; Stanislav Iakymenko; Jin-Tang Xu; Guang-Hui Hou; Bing-Ji Sun; A-Ning Zheng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  A Review of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.

Authors:  Anahita Kate; Sayan Basu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 3.  Keratoprostheses for corneal blindness: a review of contemporary devices.

Authors:  Venkata S Avadhanam; Helen E Smith; Christopher Liu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 4.  Keratoprosthesis: A Review of Recent Advances in the Field.

Authors:  Borja Salvador-Culla; Paraskevi E Kolovou
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2016-05-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.