Literature DB >> 20813332

Receiving a pharmaceutical care service compared to receiving standard pharmacy service in Sweden--How do patients differ with regard to perceptions of medicine use and the pharmacy encounter?

Anna T Montgomery1, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong, Nila Manap, Mary P Tully, Asa Kettis Lindblad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Qualitative research has shown that gaining control of medicine treatment and increased feelings of safety and empowerment are central concepts in patients' perceptions of a pharmaceutical care (PC) service provided in Sweden. However, little is known about any unique differences among patients receiving PC versus standard pharmacy services (SSs) and the impact of these services on patient-perceived outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare patients who had previously received a PC service and patients who had received a SS with regard to their perceptions of medicine use and the pharmacy encounter.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey design comparing matched groups of patients who were previously elected to receive a PC service or who had received SS. Patients who were 60 years or older and used 5 or more prescription medicines concomitantly were included in the survey. Questionnaires included questions about perceptions of safety in drug therapy, general health, drug-related problems (DRPs), medication beliefs, adherence, and experiences of pharmacy encounters.
RESULTS: Patients receiving the PC service used more prescription medicines, reported poorer self-reported health, and less perceived safety in their medicine therapy than did patients in SS. PC patients reported that they felt safer with medications, felt a genuine interest from the pharmacist, received important information, and felt more prepared to see the doctor after having spoken to the pharmacist than did patients in SS. DRPs reported to a greater extent by patients receiving the PC service included difficulties opening containers, worries about side effects, experiences of side effects, worries about drug-drug interactions, and inadequate treatment effects. Adherence and medication beliefs showed no statistical difference between groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients receiving a PC service are a worried, vulnerable, and information-seeking group. When compared with patients receiving SS, the PC patients are more insecure about their medicine therapy, although talking to a pharmacist increased their self-reported feelings of safety and provided better preparation for visits to the doctor. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20813332     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  7 in total

1.  Counselling behaviour and content in a pharmaceutical care service in Swedish community pharmacies.

Authors:  Anna T Montgomery; Asa Kettis Lindblad; Pernilla Eddby; Emelie Söderlund; Mary P Tully; Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-05-06

2.  Customer interest in and experience with various types of pharmacy counselling - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Susanne Kaae; Janine M Traulsen; Lotte S Nørgaard
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Exploring patients' motivation to participate in Australia's Home Medicines Review program.

Authors:  Stephen R Carter; Rebekah Moles; Lesley White; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-06-07

Review 4.  Understanding patients' adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework.

Authors:  Rob Horne; Sarah C E Chapman; Rhian Parham; Nick Freemantle; Alastair Forbes; Vanessa Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Physicians' and patients' valuation of pharmaceutical care implementation in Poznan (Poland) community pharmacies.

Authors:  Magdalena Waszyk-Nowaczyk; Piotr Nowaczyk; Marek Simon
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Qualitative study on the implementation of professional pharmacy services in Australian community pharmacies using framework analysis.

Authors:  Joanna C Moullin; Daniel Sabater-Hernández; Shalom I Benrimoj
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Comparison of pharmacist and public views and experiences of community pharmacy medicines-related services in England.

Authors:  Ruth M Rodgers; Shivaun M Gammie; Ruey Leng Loo; Sarah A Corlett; Janet Krska
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.