Literature DB >> 20813283

Hemodynamic basis of exercise limitation in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction.

Micha T Maeder1, Bruce R Thompson, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, David M Kaye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to invasively investigate the hemodynamic response to exercise in patients with heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) and to evaluate the ability of the peak early diastolic transmitral velocity to peak early diastolic annular velocity ratio (E/e') to reflect exercise hemodynamics.
BACKGROUND: There is little information regarding the hemodynamic response to exercise in HFNEF.
METHODS: Patients with HFNEF (n = 14) and asymptomatic controls (n = 8) underwent right-side heart catheterization at rest and during supine cycle ergometer exercise and echocardiography with measurement of resting and peak exercise E/e'.
RESULTS: Resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (10 +/- 4 mm Hg vs. 10 +/- 4 mm Hg; p = 0.94) was similar in HFNEF patients and controls, but stroke volume index (SVI) (p = 0.02) was lower, and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (p = 0.01) was higher in patients. Patients stopped exercise at lower work rate (0.63 +/- 0.29 W/kg vs. 1.13 +/- 0.49 W/kg; p = 0.006). Although peak exercise PCWP was similar in both groups (23 +/- 6 mm Hg vs. 20 +/- 7 mm Hg; p = 0.31), the peak PCWP/work rate ratio was higher in patients compared with controls (46 +/- 31 mm Hg/W/kg vs. 20 +/- 9 mm Hg/W/kg; p = 0.03). Peak exercise SVI (p = 0.001) was lower and SVRI was higher (p = 0.01) in patients. Resting E/e' was modestly elevated in patients (13.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 9.5 +/- 3.4; p = 0.04). Peak exercise E/e' did not differ between the groups (11.1 +/- 3.4 vs. 9.4 +/- 3.4; p = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS: The HFNEF patients achieved a similar peak exercise PCWP to that of asymptomatic controls, at a much lower workload. This occurs at a lower SVI and in the setting of higher SVRI. The E/e' does not reflect the hemodynamic changes during exercise in HFNEF patients.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813283     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  106 in total

1.  MRI catheterization in cardiopulmonary disease.

Authors:  Toby Rogers; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Noninvasive prediction of the exercise-induced elevation in left ventricular filling pressure in post-heart transplant patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jaroslav Meluzin; Petr Hude; Jan Krejci; Lenka Spinarova; Helena Podrouzkova; Pavel Leinveber; Ladislav Dusek; Vladimir Soska; Josef Tomandl; Petr Nemec
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013

3.  Myocardial Energetics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Bradley J Kemp; Barry A Borlaug; Brian P Mullan; Atta Behfar; Sorin V Pislaru; Marat Fudim; Margaret M Redfield; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.790

4.  Myocardial Injury and Cardiac Reserve in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Masaru Obokata; Yogesh N V Reddy; Vojtech Melenovsky; Garvan C Kane; Thomas P Olson; Petr Jarolim; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Phenotype-Specific Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multiorgan Roadmap.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Dalane W Kitzman; Barry A Borlaug; Loek van Heerebeek; Michael R Zile; David A Kass; Walter J Paulus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Low level exercise echocardiography helps diagnose early stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a study of echocardiography versus catheterization.

Authors:  Nadjib Hammoudi; Florent Laveau; Gérard Helft; Nathalie Cozic; Olivier Barthelemy; Alexandre Ceccaldi; Thibaut Petroni; Emmanuel Berman; Michel Komajda; Pierre-Louis Michel; Alain Mallet; Claude Le Feuvre; Richard Isnard
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Echocardiographic Diastolic Stress Testing: What Does It Add?

Authors:  Kyung-Hee Kim; Garvan C Kane; Christina L Luong; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Cardiac output response to exercise in relation to metabolic demand in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Muaz M Abudiab; Margaret M Redfield; Vojtech Melenovsky; Thomas P Olson; David A Kass; Bruce D Johnson; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 15.534

9.  Impaired aerobic capacity and physical functional performance in older heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: role of lean body mass.

Authors:  Mark J Haykowsky; Peter H Brubaker; Timothy M Morgan; Stephen Kritchevsky; Joel Eggebeen; Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Skeletal muscle abnormalities and exercise intolerance in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Dalane W Kitzman; Barbara Nicklas; William E Kraus; Mary F Lyles; Joel Eggebeen; Timothy M Morgan; Mark Haykowsky
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.