Literature DB >> 20812726

Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future.

Jeroen B Guinée1, Reinout Heijungs, Gjalt Huppes, Alessandra Zamagni, Paolo Masoni, Roberto Buonamici, Tomas Ekvall, Tomas Rydberg.   

Abstract

Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) has developed fast over the last three decades. Whereas LCA developed from merely energy analysis to a comprehensive environmental burden analysis in the 1970s, full-fledged life cycle impact assessment and life cycle costing models were introduced in the 1980s and 1990 s, and social-LCA and particularly consequential LCA gained ground in the first decade of the 21st century. Many of the more recent developments were initiated to broaden traditional environmental LCA to a more comprehensive Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis (LCSA). Recently, a framework for LCSA was suggested linking life cycle sustainability questions to knowledge needed for addressing them, identifying available knowledge and related models, knowledge gaps, and defining research programs to fill these gaps. LCA is evolving into LCSA, which is a transdisciplinary integration framework of models rather than a model in itself. LCSA works with a plethora of disciplinary models and guides selecting the proper ones, given a specific sustainability question. Structuring, selecting, and making the plethora of disciplinary models practically available in relation to different types of life cycle sustainability questions is the main challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20812726     DOI: 10.1021/es101316v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  27 in total

1.  Life Cycle Analysis and Global Environmental Health Issues.

Authors:  Julia M Gohlke
Journal:  J Health Pollut       Date:  2015-12-21

Review 2.  Application of Life Cycle Assessment on Electronic Waste Management: A Review.

Authors:  Mianqiang Xue; Zhenming Xu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Coupling Computer-Aided Process Simulation and Estimations of Emissions and Land Use for Rapid Life Cycle Inventory Modeling.

Authors:  Raymond L Smith; Gerardo J Ruiz-Mercado; David E Meyer; Michael A Gonzalez; John P Abraham; William M Barrett; Paul M Randall
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 8.198

4.  The software tool to find greener solvent replacements, PARIS III.

Authors:  Paul Harten; Todd Martin; Michael Gonzalez; Douglas Young
Journal:  Environ Prog Sustain Energy       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Enhancing life cycle chemical exposure assessment through ontology modeling.

Authors:  David E Meyer; Sidney C Bailin; Daniel Vallero; Peter P Egeghy; Shi V Liu; Elaine A Cohen Hubal
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Life cycle analysis of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and its salts in China.

Authors:  Jing Meng; Yonglong Lu; Tieyu Wang; Pei Wang; John P Giesy; Andrew J Sweetman; Qifeng Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  ASAS-CSAS ANNUAL MEETING SYMPOSIUM ON WATER USE EFFICIENCY AT THE FORAGE-ANIMAL INTERFACE: Life cycle assessment of forage-based livestock production systems.

Authors:  Dirk Philipp; Ben Putman; Greg Thoma
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  A Process Systems Framework for Rapid Generation of Life Cycle Inventories for Pollution Control and Sustainability Evaluation.

Authors:  Shuyun Li; Yacine Feliachi; Selorme Agbleze; Gerardo J Ruiz-Mercado; Raymond L Smith; David E Meyer; Michael A Gonzalez; Fernando V Lima
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 9.  Toward a Healthy and Environmentally Sustainable Campus Food Environment: A Scoping Review of Postsecondary Food Interventions.

Authors:  Kirsten M Lee; Goretty M Dias; Karla Boluk; Steffanie Scott; Yi-Shin Chang; Tabitha E Williams; Sharon I Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 8.701

10.  Comparative analysis of carbon footprint between conventional smallholder operation and innovative largescale farming of urban agriculture in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yingjie Hu; Jin Sun; Ji Zheng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.