Literature DB >> 20812266

Robotic single-incision transabdominal and transvaginal surgery: initial experience with intersecting robotic arms.

Monika E Hagen1, Oliver J Wagner, Ihsan Inan, Philippe Morel, Jean Fasel, Garth Jacobsen, Adam Spivack, Kari Thompson, Brian Wong, Lauren Fischer, Mark Talamini, Santiago Horgan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) are technically challenging methods. Robotics might have the potential to overcome such hurdles with computer technology.
METHODS: The da Vinci Standard and S System (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, USA) were used in human cadavers and pigs to perform single-incision transabdominal and transvaginal surgery. Robotic arms were crossed and control-switched to achieve intuitive control.
RESULTS: It was possible to perform robotic single-incision laparoscopy in the typical, intuitive fashion. Transvaginal set-up, including docking of the system and introduction of instruments into the abdominal cavity, was possible but no useful manipulation could be performed.
CONCLUSIONS: While robotic NOTES with the da Vinci surgical system was not successful, robotic single-incision surgery is feasible using the above set-up. This new approach seems to offer the advantages of single-incision surgery while maintaining the intuitive control of robotic surgery. Clinical application appears justified. Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20812266     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  8 in total

Review 1.  Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.

Authors:  M Jung; P Morel; L Buehler; N C Buchs; M E Hagen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Philippe Morel; Monika E Hagen; Pascal Bucher; Nicolas C Buchs; Francois Pugin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  On the suitability of Thiel cadavers for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): surgical training, feasibility studies, and anatomical education.

Authors:  Andrea Porzionato; Lino Polese; Emanuele Lezoche; Veronica Macchi; Giovanni Lezoche; Gianfranco Da Dalt; Carla Stecco; Lorenzo Norberto; Stefano Merigliano; Raffaele De Caro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Urological applications of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy as a scarless and gasless surgery.

Authors:  Yun Seok Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Advancing Molecular-Guided Surgery through probe development and testing in a moderate cost evaluation pipeline.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Sally M Hull; Kimberly S Samkoe; Jason Gunn; Jack Hoopes; David W Roberts; Theresa V Strong; Daniel Draney; Joachim Feldwisch
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-04

7.  Robotic single-site versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-matched analysis of short- and long-term costs.

Authors:  Monika E Hagen; Alexandre Balaphas; Michele Podetta; Peter Rohner; Minoa K Jung; Nicolas C Buchs; Leo Buehler; Jona M Mendoza; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Philippe Morel; Francois Pugin; Pascal Bucher; Nicolas C Buchs; Monika E Hagen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-10-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.