Literature DB >> 20811926

Role of planktonic and sessile extracellular metabolic byproducts on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli intra and interspecies relationships.

Susana Patrícia Lopes1, Idalina Machado, Maria Olívia Pereira.   

Abstract

Bacterial species are found primarily as residents of complex surface-associated communities, known as biofilms. Although these structures prevail in nature, bacteria still exist in planktonic lifestyle and differ from those in morphology, physiology, and metabolism. This study aimed to investigate the influence of physiological states of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli in cell-to-cell interactions. Filtered supernatants obtained under planktonic and biofilm cultures of each single species were supplemented with tryptic soy broth (TSB) and used as the growth media (conditioned media) to planktonic and sessile growth of both single- and two-species cultures. Planktonic bacterial growth was examined through OD(640) measurement. One-day-old biofilms were evaluated in terms of biofilm biomass (CV), respiratory activity (XTT), and CFU number. Conditioned media obtained either in biofilm or in planktonic mode of life triggered a synergistic effect on planktonic growth, mainly for E. coli single cultures growing in P. aeruginosa supernatants. Biofilms grown in the presence of P. aeruginosa biofilms-derived metabolites presented less mass and activity. These events highlight that, when developed in biofilm, P. aeruginosa release signals or metabolites able to prejudice single and binary biofilm growth of others species and of their own species. However, products released by their planktonic counterparts did not impair biofilm growth or activity. E. coli, living as planktonic or sessile cultures, released signals and metabolites or removed un-beneficial compounds which promoted the growth and activity of all the species. Our findings revealed that inter and intraspecies behaviors depend on the involved bacteria and their adopted mode of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20811926     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0838-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  47 in total

Review 1.  Oral microbial communities: biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems.

Authors:  P E Kolenbrander
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 2.  Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms.

Authors:  Matthew R Parsek; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 3.  Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria.

Authors:  Christopher M Waters; Bonnie L Bassler
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 13.827

4.  Synergy between Tannerella forsythia and Fusobacterium nucleatum in biofilm formation.

Authors:  A Sharma; S Inagaki; W Sigurdson; H K Kuramitsu
Journal:  Oral Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2005-02

Review 5.  Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal?

Authors:  Stephen P Diggle; Andy Gardner; Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Bacterial quorum sensing: signals, circuits, and implications for biofilms and disease.

Authors:  Arul Jayaraman; Thomas K Wood
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Positive interactions among competitors can produce species-rich communities.

Authors:  Kevin Gross
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  SdiA of Salmonella enterica is a LuxR homolog that detects mixed microbial communities.

Authors:  B Michael; J N Smith; S Swift; F Heffron; B M Ahmer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Coaggregation-mediated interactions of streptococci and actinomyces detected in initial human dental plaque.

Authors:  Robert J Palmer; Sharon M Gordon; John O Cisar; Paul E Kolenbrander
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Ecology of mixed biofilms subjected daily to a chlorinated alkaline solution: spatial distribution of bacterial species suggests a protective effect of one species to another.

Authors:  V Leriche; R Briandet; B Carpentier
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.491

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Intra- and inter-species interactions within biofilms of important foodborne bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Efstathios Giaouris; Even Heir; Mickaël Desvaux; Michel Hébraud; Trond Møretrø; Solveig Langsrud; Agapi Doulgeraki; George-John Nychas; Miroslava Kačániová; Katarzyna Czaczyk; Hülya Ölmez; Manuel Simões
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Collagen and hyaluronan at wound sites influence early polymicrobial biofilm adhesive events.

Authors:  Eric Birkenhauer; Suresh Neethirajan; J Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.605

3.  Pseudomonas putida as a potential biocontrol agent against Salmonella Java biofilm formation in the drinking water system of broiler houses.

Authors:  Sharon Maes; Koen De Reu; Stephanie Van Weyenberg; Bram Lories; Marc Heyndrickx; Hans Steenackers
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Does Secondary Plant Metabolite Ursolic Acid Exhibit Antibacterial Activity against Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Living in Single- and Multispecies Biofilms?

Authors:  Zuzanna Sycz; Dorota Wojnicz; Dorota Tichaczek-Goska
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Are Uropathogenic Bacteria Living in Multispecies Biofilm Susceptible to Active Plant Ingredient-Asiatic Acid?

Authors:  Zuzanna Sycz; Dorota Tichaczek-Goska; Anna Jezierska-Domaradzka; Dorota Wojnicz
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-11-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.