Literature DB >> 20810939

Bone void fillers.

John S Kirkpatrick1, Charles N Cornell, Bang H Hoang, Wellington Hsu, J Tracy Watson, William C Watters, Charles M Turkelson, Janet L Wies, Sara Anderson.   

Abstract

For this technology overview, the tools of evidence-based medicine were used to summarize information on the effectiveness and clinical outcomes related to the usage of bone void fillers- specifically, synthetic graft materials. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted to address five key questions, which the task force that prepared the report posed as follows. Question 1 addressed the use of synthetic bone void fillers alone. Question 2 was designed to determine whether synthetic bone void fillers could successfully serve as graft extenders and eliminate the need for iliac crest bone graft. Questions 3, 4, and 5 addressed the use of allografts as a comparison with synthetic fillers because clinical results with allografts are perceived as being much closer to autografts in these areas of the spine.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810939     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201009000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  7 in total

Review 1.  Vascularization in bone tissue engineering constructs.

Authors:  Ángel E Mercado-Pagán; Alexander M Stahl; Yaser Shanjani; Yunzhi Yang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Evaluation of a bone filler scaffold for local antibiotic delivery to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection in a contaminated bone defect.

Authors:  Karen E Beenken; Mara J Campbell; Aura M Ramirez; Karrar Alghazali; Christopher M Walker; Bailey Jackson; Christopher Griffin; William King; Shawn E Bourdo; Rebecca Rifkin; Silke Hecht; Daniel G Meeker; David E Anderson; Alexandru S Biris; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Compositions and Structural Geometries of Scaffolds Used in the Regeneration of Cleft Palates: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Víctor A Reyna-Urrutia; Arely M González-González; Raúl Rosales-Ibáñez
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.329

4.  Effect of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles and Nitrogen Plasma Treatment on Osteoblast Biological Behaviors of 3D-Printed HDPE Scaffold for Bone Tissue Regeneration Applications.

Authors:  Hyunchul Park; Jaeyoung Ryu; Seunggon Jung; Hongju Park; Heekyun Oh; Minsuk Kook
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management.

Authors:  Gabriel Fernandez de Grado; Laetitia Keller; Ysia Idoux-Gillet; Quentin Wagner; Anne-Marie Musset; Nadia Benkirane-Jessel; Fabien Bornert; Damien Offner
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 6.  3D-Bioprinting Strategies Based on In Situ Bone-Healing Mechanism for Vascularized Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Ye Lin Park; Kiwon Park; Jae Min Cha
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  3D Bioprinted Bacteriostatic Hyperelastic Bone Scaffold for Damage-Specific Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Shokouhimehr; Andrea S Theus; Archana Kamalakar; Liqun Ning; Cong Cao; Martin L Tomov; Jarred M Kaiser; Steven Goudy; Nick J Willett; Ho Won Jang; Christopher N LaRock; Philip Hanna; Aron Lechtig; Mohamed Yousef; Janaina Da Silva Martins; Ara Nazarian; Mitchel B Harris; Morteza Mahmoudi; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.329

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.