Literature DB >> 20810676

Special article: personal protective equipment for care of pandemic influenza patients: a training workshop for the powered air purifying respirator.

Bonnie M Tompkins1, John P Kerchberger.   

Abstract

Virulent respiratory infectious diseases may present a life-threatening risk for health care professionals during aerosol-generating procedures, including endotracheal intubation. The 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) brings this concern to the immediate forefront. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have stated that, when performing or participating in aerosol-generating procedures on patients with virulent contagious respiratory diseases, health care professionals must wear a minimum of the N95 respirator, and they may wish to consider using the powered air purifying respirator (PAPR). For influenza and other diseases transmitted by both respiratory and contact modes, protective respirators must be combined with contact precautions. The PAPR provides 2.5 to 100 times greater protection than the N95, when used within the context of an Occupational Safety and Health Administration-compliant respiratory protection program. The relative protective capability of a respirator is quantified using the assigned protection factor. The level of protection designated by the APF can only be achieved with appropriate training and correct use of the respirator. Face seal leakage limits the protective capability of the N95 respirator, and fit testing does not assure the ability to maintain a tight face seal. The protective capability of the PAPR will be defeated by improper handling of contaminated equipment, incorrect assembly and maintenance, and improper don (put on) and doff (take off) procedures. Stress, discomfort, and physical encumbrance may impair performance. Acclimatization through training will mitigate these effects. Training in the use of PAPRs in advance of their need is strongly advised. "Just in time" training is unlikely to provide adequate preparation for groups of practitioners requiring specialized personal protective equipment during a pandemic. Employee health departments in hospitals may not presently have a PAPR training program in place. Anesthesia and critical care providers would be well advised to take the lead in working with their hospitals' employee health departments to establish a PAPR training program where none exists. User instructions state that the PAPR should not be used during surgery because it generates positive outward airflow, and may increase the risk of wound infection. Clarification of this prohibition and acceptable solutions are currently lacking and need to be addressed. The surgical hood system is not an acceptable alternative. We provide on line a PAPR training workshop. Supporting information is presented here. Anesthesia and critical care providers may use this workshop to supplement, but not substitute for, the manufacturers' detailed use and maintenance instructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810676     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e780f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  32 in total

Review 1.  Respiratory Protective Equipment for Healthcare Providers During Coronavirus Pandemic: "Nec Temere, Nec Timide".

Authors:  H Bengü Çobanoğlu; Görkem Eskiizmir; Mustafa Kürşat Gökcan
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 2.  Always ready, always prepared-preparing for the next pandemic.

Authors:  Mitchell Hamele; Katie Neumayer; Jill Sweney; W Bradley Poss
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2018-10

3.  Learning experience on sentinel cases of COVID-19 at a public healthcare institution: sharing on operating room processes.

Authors:  Frederick H Koh; Keen-Chong Chau; Siok-Peng Ng; Li-Ming Teo; Sharon Gk Ong; Wai-Keong Wong; Biauw-Chi Ong; Min-Hoe Chew
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.331

4.  Prevalence of Respiratory Protective Devices in U.S. Health Care Facilities: Implications for Emergency Preparedness.

Authors:  Kerri Wizner; Lindsay Stradtman; Debra Novak; Ronald Shaffer
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.413

5.  Infection prevention measures and outcomes for surgical patients during a COVID-19 outbreak in a tertiary hospital in Daegu, South Korea: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Kyung-Hwa Kwak; Jay Kyoung Kim; Ki Tae Kwon; Jinseok Yeo
Journal:  J Yeungnam Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-05

6.  Guidelines for Surgical Tracheostomy and Tracheostomy Tube Change During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review Article.

Authors:  Suma Radhakrishnan; Hafees Abdullah Perumbally; Sai Surya; Mohammed Shareef Ponneth
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-22

7.  The Possible Factors Correlated with The Higher Risk of Getting Infected by COVID-19 in Emergency Medical Technicians; A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Mostafa Sadeghi; Peyman Saberian; Parisa Hasani-Sharamin; Fatemeh Dadashi; Sepideh Babaniamansour; Ehsan Aliniagerdroudbari
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2021-04

8.  Anesthesiologists and the High Risk of Exposure to COVID-19.

Authors:  Nayely García-Méndez; Juan Lagarda Cuevas; Tamara Otzen; Carlos Manterola
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 9.  Surgical Considerations in Patients with COVID-19: What Orthopaedic Surgeons Should Know.

Authors:  Zhen Chang Liang; Mark Seng Ye Chong; Ming Ann Sim; Joel Louis Lim; Pablo Castañeda; Daniel W Green; Dale Fisher; Lian Kah Ti; Diarmuid Murphy; James Hoi Po Hui
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 10.  Aligning difficult airway guidelines with the anesthetic COVID-19 guidelines to develop a COVID-19 difficult airway strategy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Patrick Wong; Wan Yen Lim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.