Literature DB >> 20809372

Consensual sex between men and sexual violence in Australian prisons.

Juliet Richters1, Tony Butler, Karen Schneider, Lorraine Yap, Kristie Kirkwood, Luke Grant, Alun Richards, Anthony M A Smith, Basil Donovan.   

Abstract

Estimates of the incidence of sexual coercion in men's prisons are notoriously variable and fraught with conceptual and methodological problems. In 2006-2007, we conducted a computer-assisted telephone survey of a random sample of 2,018 male prisoners in New South Wales and Queensland. Of 2,626 eligible and available inmates, 76.8% consented and provided full responses. We asked about time in prison, sexual experience, attraction and (homo/bi/heterosexual) identity, attitudes, sexual contact with other inmates, reasons for having sex and practices engaged in, and about sexual coercion, including location and number of perpetrators. Most men (95.1%) identified as heterosexual. Of the total sample, 13.5% reported sexual contact with males in their lifetime: 7.8% only outside prison, 2.8% both inside and outside, and 2.7% only inside prison. Later in the interview, 144 men (7.1% of total sample) reported sexual contact with inmates in prison; the majority had few partners and no anal intercourse. Most did so for pleasure, but some for protection, i.e., to avoid assault by someone else. Before incarceration, 32.9% feared sexual assault in prison; 6.9% had been sexually threatened in prison and 2.6% had been sexually coerced ("forced or frightened into doing something sexually that [they] did not want"). Some of those coerced reported no same-sex contact. The majority of prisoners were intolerant of male-to-male sexual activity. The study achieved a high response rate and asked detailed questions to elicit reports of coercion and sex separately. Both consensual sex and sexual assault are less common than is generally believed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20809372     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-010-9667-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  7 in total

Review 1.  Prisons: ignore them at our peril.

Authors:  Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Annette Verster; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Development of a frailty framework among vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Benissa E Salem; Adeline Nyamathi; Linda R Phillips; Janet C Mentes; Catherine Sarkisian; Mary-Lynn Brecht
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.824

3.  Predictors of sexual behaviour among men and women in New York City area prisons.

Authors:  Tawandra L Rowell-Cunsolo; Betsy Szeto; Stephen A Sampong; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2016-06-08

4.  The naked truth about HIV and risk taking in Swedish prisons: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sigrid J A Lindbom; Markus Larsson; Anette Agardh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ethical Challenges of HIV Partner Notification in Prisons.

Authors:  Gabriel J Culbert; Valerie A Earnshaw; Judith A Levy
Journal:  J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

6.  Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex.

Authors:  Tony Butler; Juliet Richters; Lorraine Yap; Basil Donovan
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  "INSIDE" Project on Sexual Health in Spain: Sexual Life During the Lockdown Caused by COVID-19.

Authors:  Rafael Ballester-Arnal; Juan E Nebot-Garcia; Estefanía Ruiz-Palomino; Cristina Giménez-García; María Dolores Gil-Llario
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2020-11-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.