Literature DB >> 20809230

Comprehensive evaluation of a single-stage submaximal treadmill walking protocol in healthy, middle-aged women.

Melanie Mitros1, Kelley Pettee Gabriel, Barbara Ainsworth, Chong Lee, Stephen Herrmann, Kathy Campbell, Pamela Swan.   

Abstract

Cardiorespiratory fitness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in women; however, maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) protocols are not always feasible. The Evaluation of Physical Activity Measures in Middle-Aged Women Study was a 6-week study designed to evaluate six physical activity (PA) measures in women, aged 45-65 years. We investigated the Ebbeling submaximal treadmill (EbbTM) protocol's ability to reflect an active lifestyle in 66 women [median (IQR) age, 51.0 (48.0, 56.5) years]. Participants were screened using ACSM and AHA guidelines and classified as moderate or low cardiovascular risk. VO(2max) was estimated using the EbbTM in all participants (TEST1). Moderate risk women repeated the EbbTM (TEST2) while low risk completed a maximal treadmill test. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC(90)) score were calculated to examine reliability. Spearman rank order or Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were used to determine the association between estimated VO(2max) and physical fitness and activity measures. Estimated VO(2max) from the EbbTM protocol had excellent reproducibility [ICC = 0.95 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.98) and MDC(90) was 1.62 mL kg(-1) min(-1). The EbbTM protocol was associated with measured VO(2max) (ρ = 0.48; p = 0.01) and was positively correlated with moderate- (ρ = 0.32; p = 0.02), vigorous- (ρ = 0.47; p = 0.0005) and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA (ρ = 0.36; p = 0.009), pedometer steps (ρ = 0.41; p = 0.002) and inversely correlated with waist circumference (ρ = -0.58; p < 0.0001), body fat (ρ = -0.55; p < 0.0001), and right leg endurance (ρ = -0.41; p = 0.003). The EbbTM protocol was shown to be reliable and associated with objective measures of fitness and PA in healthy, middle-aged women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20809230     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1615-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  23 in total

1.  Assessment of physical activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., accelerometer: laboratory versus field validation.

Authors:  J F Nichols; C G Morgan; L E Chabot; J F Sallis; K J Calfas
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveys.

Authors:  W J Brown; S G Trost; A Bauman; K Mummery; N Owen
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 3.  Calibration of accelerometer output for adults.

Authors:  Charles E Matthew
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Recommendations for cardiovascular screening, staffing, and emergency policies at health/fitness facilities.

Authors:  G J Balady; B Chaitman; D Driscoll; C Foster; E Froelicher; N Gordon; R Pate; J Rippe; T Bazzarre
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

6.  Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research.

Authors:  C J Caspersen; K E Powell; G M Christenson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  VO2max estimation from a submaximal 1-mile track jog for fit college-age individuals.

Authors:  J D George; P R Vehrs; P E Allsen; G W Fellingham; A G Fisher
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Submaximal tests for estimating maximum oxygen intake.

Authors:  C H Wyndham
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1967-03-25       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Musculoskeletal fitness and risk of mortality.

Authors:  Peter T Katzmarzyk; Cora L Craig
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Estimation of maximal oxygen uptake via submaximal exercise testing in sports, clinical, and home settings.

Authors:  Francesco Sartor; Gianluca Vernillo; Helma M de Morree; Alberto G Bonomi; Antonio La Torre; Hans-Peter Kubis; Arsenio Veicsteinas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on classical cardiovascular disease risk factors in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Authors:  J K Cooney; Y A Ahmad; J P Moore; A Sandoo; J M Thom
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Enhanced insulin sensitivity in successful, long-term weight loss maintainers compared with matched controls with no weight loss history.

Authors:  L D Clamp; D J Hume; E V Lambert; J Kroff
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.097

4.  Waist circumference vs body mass index in association with cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men and women: a cross sectional analysis of 403 subjects.

Authors:  Shiri Sherf Dagan; Shlomo Segev; Ilya Novikov; Rachel Dankner
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.271

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.