OBJECTIVE: Determining the feasibility of implementing a new concept to objectively evaluate actual functional abilities of transfemoral amputees into a new measuring tool called "Assessment of Daily Activity Performance in Transfemoral amputees" (ADAPT). DESIGN: Study 1: cross-sectional design. Study 2: repeated measures design. SUBJECTS: Study 1 comprised two groups of 10 participants, age range 19-72 years. One group used microprocessor-controlled knee joints and the other group used mechanically controlled knee joints. Study 2 comprised 20 participants, age range 31-68 years. METHODS: Two versions of ADAPT were assessed in the separate studies. In study 1 performance times on version 1 of ADAPT were compared between groups. In study 2 participants completed version 2 of ADAPT twice with a 1 h rest between trials. The Locomotor Capabilities Index was administered. Reliability was determined by calculating correlation coefficients and by Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: In study 1, ADAPT version 1 proved to be sensitive in detecting differences in performance between groups. In study 2, 75% of all correlation coefficients exceeded 0.90 in version 2 of ADAPT. Bland-Altman analyses showed high test-retest agreement. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to reliably assess actual functional abilities of transfemoral amputees using standardized simulations of daily activities. This ADAPT concept is able to differentiate between different functional performance levels.
OBJECTIVE: Determining the feasibility of implementing a new concept to objectively evaluate actual functional abilities of transfemoral amputees into a new measuring tool called "Assessment of Daily Activity Performance in Transfemoral amputees" (ADAPT). DESIGN: Study 1: cross-sectional design. Study 2: repeated measures design. SUBJECTS: Study 1 comprised two groups of 10 participants, age range 19-72 years. One group used microprocessor-controlled knee joints and the other group used mechanically controlled knee joints. Study 2 comprised 20 participants, age range 31-68 years. METHODS: Two versions of ADAPT were assessed in the separate studies. In study 1 performance times on version 1 of ADAPT were compared between groups. In study 2 participants completed version 2 of ADAPT twice with a 1 h rest between trials. The Locomotor Capabilities Index was administered. Reliability was determined by calculating correlation coefficients and by Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: In study 1, ADAPT version 1 proved to be sensitive in detecting differences in performance between groups. In study 2, 75% of all correlation coefficients exceeded 0.90 in version 2 of ADAPT. Bland-Altman analyses showed high test-retest agreement. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to reliably assess actual functional abilities of transfemoral amputees using standardized simulations of daily activities. This ADAPT concept is able to differentiate between different functional performance levels.
Authors: Patrick J R Theeven; Bea Hemmen; Peter R G Brink; Rob J E M Smeets; Henk A M Seelen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Michael S Orendurff; Silvia U Raschke; Lorne Winder; David Moe; David A Boone; Toshiki Kobayashi Journal: J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Date: 2016-03-09