Andrew McNaught1, Paul McHardy, Imad T Awad. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Holland Orthopedic and Arthritic Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The posterior interscalene block has been described as an alternative to the lateral interscalene block. However, this technique has not gained popularity because of the close proximity of the approach to vascular and central neural structures. OBJECTIVE: To describe the posterior interscalene block technique using ultrasound imaging, and to review the history of its evolution. METHODS: The use of ultrasound imaging to facilitate the insertion of interscalene catheters using the posterior approach in 11 patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty is described. RESULTS: All 11 patients had satisfactory analgesia in the first 24 h of the postoperative period. None of the patients complained of neck pain, as had been found in earlier techniques using the posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: This modification of the posterior approach is a safe and effective method for the insertion of interscalene brachial plexus catheters. These catheters are also comfortable for patients and, in the present study, none of the catheters inadvertently fell out.
BACKGROUND: The posterior interscalene block has been described as an alternative to the lateral interscalene block. However, this technique has not gained popularity because of the close proximity of the approach to vascular and central neural structures. OBJECTIVE: To describe the posterior interscalene block technique using ultrasound imaging, and to review the history of its evolution. METHODS: The use of ultrasound imaging to facilitate the insertion of interscalene catheters using the posterior approach in 11 patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty is described. RESULTS: All 11 patients had satisfactory analgesia in the first 24 h of the postoperative period. None of the patients complained of neck pain, as had been found in earlier techniques using the posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: This modification of the posterior approach is a safe and effective method for the insertion of interscalene brachial plexus catheters. These catheters are also comfortable for patients and, in the present study, none of the catheters inadvertently fell out.
Authors: Henning Hermanns; Sebastian Braun; Robert Werdehausen; Andreas Werner; Peter Lipfert; Markus F Stevens Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Ignace Sandefo; J-M Bernard; Van Elstraete; T Lebrun; B Polin; F Alla; C Poey; L Savorit Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Harald C Rettig; Mathieu J M Gielen; Nigel T M Jack; Eric Boersma; Jan Klein Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.288