Literature DB >> 20808608

Distributed guidelines (DiG): a software framework for extending automated health decision support to the general population.

Edwin Yaqub1, Andre Barroso.   

Abstract

This article presents a framework and methodology to create personal health record (PHR) systems able to transform raw health data into meaningful information for the general population. By bridging the semantic gap between an individual and his or her health data, it is expected that better care will ensue through consumer empowerment. An important challenge for the realization of this vision is the lack of available expert knowledge in a format that is concomitantly easy to codify, share, and be used by the general population. To address this challenge, we developed a novel approach to encode expert knowledge into machine-interpretable, reusable components called "consumer guidelines." Once encoded, guidelines are easily shared, extended, and modified. These guidelines can exist as distributed documents on the Internet and be executed by our processing engine (Health-Guru) to provide an individual with personalized assessment against various health risks based on the evidence data stored in a PHR.

Keywords:  clinical guidelines; decision support techniques; ontology; personal health records; public health; semantic web

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20808608      PMCID: PMC2921300     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1559-4122


  9 in total

1.  Design and implementation of a framework to support the development of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  P A de Clercq; A Hasman; J A Blom; H H Korsten
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  From knowledge to practice in chronic cardiovascular disease: a long and winding road.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Finlay A McAlister; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  EON: a component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy.

Authors:  M A Musen; S W Tu; A K Das; Y Shahar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Enhancing the use of clinical guidelines: a social norms perspective.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Use of guidelines in primary care--practitioners' perspectives.

Authors:  C Langley; A Faulkner; C Watkins; S Gray; I Harvey
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Why do GPs not implement evidence-based guidelines? A descriptive study.

Authors:  M Cranney; E Warren; S Barton; K Gardner; T Walley
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption.

Authors:  Paul C Tang; Joan S Ash; David W Bates; J Marc Overhage; Daniel Z Sands
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines.

Authors:  L Ohno-Machado; J H Gennari; S N Murphy; N L Jain; S W Tu; D E Oliver; E Pattison-Gordon; R A Greenes; E H Shortliffe; G O Barnett
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.