Literature DB >> 20808215

Delayed time to defibrillation after intraoperative and periprocedural cardiac arrest.

Jill M Mhyre1, Satya Krishna Ramachandran, Sachin Kheterpal, Michelle Morris, Paul S Chan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delay in defibrillation (more than 2 min) is associated with worse survival in patients with a cardiac arrest because of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia in intensive care units and inpatient wards.
METHODS: We tested the relationship between delayed defibrillation and survival from intraoperative or periprocedural cardiac arrest, adjusting for baseline patient characteristics. The analysis was based on data from 865 patients who had intraoperative or periprocedural cardiac arrest caused by ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia in 259 hospitals participating in the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
RESULTS: The median time to defibrillation was less than 1 min (interquartile range, <1 to 1 min). Delays in defibrillation occurred in 119 patients (13.8%). Characteristics associated with delayed defibrillation included pulseless ventricular tachycardia and noncardiac admitting diagnosis. The association between delayed defibrillation and survival to hospital discharge differed for periprocedural and intraoperative cardiac arrests (P value for interaction = 0.003). For patients arresting outside the operating room, delayed defibrillation was associated with a lower probability of surviving to hospital discharge (31.6% vs. 62.1%, adjusted odds ratio 0.49; 95% CI 0.27, 0.88; P = 0.018). In contrast, delayed defibrillation was not associated with survival for cardiac arrests in the operating room (46.8% vs. 39.6%, adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI 0.70, 2.19, P = 0.47).
CONCLUSIONS: Delays in defibrillation occurred in one of seven cardiac arrests in the intraoperative and periprocedural arenas. Although delayed defibrillation was associated with lower rates of survival after cardiac arrests in periprocedural areas, there was no association with survival for cardiac arrests in the operating room.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20808215     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181eaa74f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  11 in total

1.  Use of an electronic decision support tool improves management of simulated in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Larry C Field; Matthew D McEvoy; Jeremy C Smalley; Carlee A Clark; Michael B McEvoy; Horst Rieke; Paul J Nietert; Cory M Furse
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Validity and reliability assessment of detailed scoring checklists for use during perioperative emergency simulation training.

Authors:  Matthew D McEvoy; William R Hand; Cory M Furse; Larry C Field; Carlee A Clark; Vivek K Moitra; Paul J Nietert; Michael F O'Connor; Mark E Nunnally
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.929

3.  Predictors of survival from perioperative cardiopulmonary arrests: a retrospective analysis of 2,524 events from the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry.

Authors:  Satya Krishna Ramachandran; Jill Mhyre; Sachin Kheterpal; Robert E Christensen; Kristen Tallman; Michelle Morris; Paul S Chan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Cryopreservation of Animals and Cryonics: Current Technical Progress, Difficulties and Possible Research Directions.

Authors:  Marlene Davis Ekpo; George Frimpong Boafo; Suleiman Shafiu Gambo; Yuying Hu; Xiangjian Liu; Jingxian Xie; Songwen Tan
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Simulation curriculum can improve medical student assessment and management of acute coronary syndrome during a clinical practice exam.

Authors:  Deborah J DeWaay; Matthew D McEvoy; Donna H Kern; Louise A Alexander; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.378

6.  Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in a general surgical population.

Authors:  James M Blum; Michael J Stentz; Ronald Dechert; Elizabeth Jewell; Milo Engoren; Andrew L Rosenberg; Pauline K Park
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Saket Girotra; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; John A Spertus; Yan Li; Harlan M Krumholz; Paul S Chan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The effect of adherence to ACLS protocols on survival of event in the setting of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Matthew D McEvoy; Larry C Field; Haley E Moore; Jeremy C Smalley; Paul J Nietert; Sheila H Scarbrough
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Validation of a detailed scoring checklist for use during advanced cardiac life support certification.

Authors:  Matthew D McEvoy; Jeremy C Smalley; Paul J Nietert; Larry C Field; Cory M Furse; John W Blenko; Benjamin G Cobb; Jenna L Walters; Allen Pendarvis; Nishita S Dalal; John J Schaefer
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.929

10.  Anesthesia advanced circulatory life support.

Authors:  Vivek K Moitra; Andrea Gabrielli; Gerald A Maccioli; Michael F O'Connor
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.