Literature DB >> 20808006

Cemented Thompson versus cemented bipolar prostheses for femoral neck fractures.

Stefan Bauer1, Patrick Isenegger, Oliver P Gautschi, Kwok M Ho, Piers J Yates, Rene Zellweger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare early functional outcomes, complications, and mortality in elderly patients treated with the less costly, cemented Thompson prosthesis or the cemented bipolar prosthesis in order to identify factors affecting outcomes.
METHODS: Records of 303 patients with femoral neck fractures treated with the cemented Thompson monoblock prosthesis (n=206) or the cemented bipolar prosthesis (n=97) were reviewed. The choice of prosthesis was solely determined by surgeon's preference. Data relating to patient demographics, clinical and residential status, mobility, mental function, mortality, and complications during hospitalisation and rehabilitation were collected.
RESULTS: After adjusting for confounding variables, independent postoperative indoor mobility was associated with preoperative indoor mobility (p=0.002) and mental function (p=0.001), whereas postoperative outdoor mobility was associated with preoperative outdoor mobility (p=0.003), daily living activity (p=0.02), and mental function (p=0.02). Mortality within 6 months was only associated with poor mental function (p=0.009). At 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 types of prosthesis in terms of functional outcomes, mortality and complication rates.
CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with limited mobility, treatment with the bipolar prosthesis was not associated with better short-term outcomes than those receiving the Thompson prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20808006     DOI: 10.1177/230949901001800207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  4 in total

Review 1.  Bipolar versus monopolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femur neck fractures: a meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Migliorini Filippo; Arne Driessen; Giorgia Colarossi; Valentin Quack; Markus Tingart; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 2.  Total hip arthroplasty compared to bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced hip fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Mira Trivellas; Jörg Eschweiler; Frank Hildebrand; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Fracture of the cemented femoral component following hemiarthroplasty in physically active patient: A case report.

Authors:  Deniz Cankaya; Burak Yoldas; Serdar Yılmaz; Ali Tecirli; Bulent Ozkurt
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

4.  Thompson hemiarthroplasty versus modular unipolar implants for patients requiring hemiarthroplasty of the hip: A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  A L Sims; A J Farrier; M R Reed; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.853

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.