Literature DB >> 20807389

Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of junior cyclists of different specialties and performance levels.

P Menaspà1, E Rampinini, A Bosio, D Carlomagno, M Riggio, A Sassi.   

Abstract

This study analyzes the anthropometric and physiological characteristics of junior cyclists within different cycling specialties and different performance levels. One hundred and thirty-two junior riders (16.8 ± 0.6 years, 177 ± 6 cm, 66.3 ± 6.7 kg) were tested for anthropometric, aerobic and anaerobic parameters. Cyclists were classified within specialties [uphill (UH) flat terrain (FT) all terrain (AT) and sprint (SP)] and performance levels, based on a seasonal ranking [low level (LL) medium level (ML) and high level (HL)]. The results of the two-way analysis of variance showed that FT and SP have greater body dimensions than UH and AT (P<0.001). Concerning the relative aerobic parameters, AT and UH have higher values (P<0.001) than FT and SP [maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max) ): 69.4 ± 3.6, 67.5 ± 5.0, 62.8 ± 4.5 and 61.9 ± 4.1 mL/kg/min, respectively] while absolute parameters resulted higher for FT and AT (P≤0.008). The relative power produced in the 5 s test was higher (P<0.001) for AT and SP than FT and UH (16.7 ± 1.1, 16.6 ± 0.6, 14.9 ± 1.7 and 14.4 ± 1.7 W/kg, respectively). Concerning the performance level, only the age and the aerobic parameters resulted differently within levels (VO(2max) : HL=67.3 ± 4.9, ML=65.5 ± 5.1 and LL=63.3 ± 5.2 mL/kg/min), with the highest values for HL (P≤0.007). In conclusion, juniors are specialized in the same way as professional cyclists and the aerobic characteristics are confirmed as significant in the performance level assessment.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20807389     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  5 in total

1.  Anthropometric Clusters of Competitive Cyclists and Their Sprint and Endurance Performance.

Authors:  Stephan van der Zwaard; Cornelis J de Ruiter; Richard T Jaspers; Jos J de Koning
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Comparative analysis of endurance, strength and body composition indicators in professional, under-23 and junior cyclists.

Authors:  Lidia B Alejo; Almudena Montalvo-Pérez; Pedro L Valenzuela; Carlos Revuelta; Laureano M Ozcoidi; Víctor de la Calle; Manuel Mateo-March; Alejandro Lucia; Alfredo Santalla; David Barranco-Gil
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Comparative Analysis of Male Cyclist Population in Four Asia Countries for Anthropometric Measurements.

Authors:  Arunachalam Muthiah; Yu-Chi Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists.

Authors:  Kamelska Anna Malwina; Mazurek Krzysztof; Zmijewski Piotr
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Predicting the next Pogačar: a data analytical approach to detect young professional cycling talents.

Authors:  Bram Janssens; Matthias Bogaert; Mathijs Maton
Journal:  Ann Oper Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.854

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.