Literature DB >> 20807172

Coagulation status in coronary artery disease patients with type II diabetes mellitus compared with non-diabetic coronary artery disease patients using the PFA-100® and ROTEM®.

M Feuring1, M Wehling, H Burkhardt, A Schultz.   

Abstract

Previous investigations in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) revealed differences in thromboelastographic parameters indicating different states of coagulability. The aim of the present study was to investigate the coagulation status of patients with documented CAD and type II diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease with the PFA-100® and the ROTEM®. No differences were found in platelet function as measured with collagen/epinephrine (263.6 ± 70.6 s vs. 254.6 ± 65.3 s) and collagen/ADP cartridges (105.3 ± 63.2 s vs. 90.6 ± 47.3 s) in CAD patients with DM and CAD patients without DM. Measured with the EXTEM reagent of the ROTEM®, mean maximum clot elasticity (MCE) in patients with CAD and DM (233.6 ± 86.9) was significantly longer than in CAD patients without DM (186.7 ± 54.5), (p = 0.03). A similar result was seen using the INTEM reagent; patients with CAD and DM (234.4 ± 83.9) showed a higher value for MCE than CAD patients without DM (190.8 ± 57.8) which was of borderline significance (p = 0.053). Moreover, a weak trend for higher maximum clot firmness (MCF) was seen in CAD patients with DM compared with CAD patients without DM with the EXTEM reagent (68.1 ± 7.5 vs. 63.6 ± 8.6, p = 0.08) and the INTEM reagent (68.4 ± 7.2 vs. 64.1 ± 8.2, p = 0.09). The ROTEM® analysis indicates increased coagulability in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus compared to non-diabetic CAD patients. Moreover, the ROTEM® device seems to be an appropriate and easy-to-use tool to describe the coagulation status in these patients groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20807172     DOI: 10.3109/09537104.2010.504868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Platelets        ISSN: 0953-7104            Impact factor:   3.862


  6 in total

Review 1.  Global coagulation assays in hypercoagulable states.

Authors:  Hui Yin Lim; Geoffrey Donnan; Harshal Nandurkar; Prahlad Ho
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Influence of race and sex on thrombogenicity in a large cohort of coronary artery disease patients.

Authors:  Eli I Lev; Kevin P Bliden; Young-Hoon Jeong; Shachi Pandya; Kelly Kang; Christopher Franzese; Udaya S Tantry; Paul A Gurbel
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Thyroxine in acute myocardial infarction (ThyrAMI) - levothyroxine in subclinical hypothyroidism post-acute myocardial infarction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Avais Jabbar; Lorna Ingoe; Simon Pearce; Azfar Zaman; Salman Razvi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Greater Fibrinolysis Resistance but No Greater Platelet Aggregation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Christoph Heinz; Wolfgang Miesbach; Eva Herrmann; Michael Sonntagbauer; Florian J Raimann; Kai Zacharowski; Christian F Weber; Elisabeth H Adam
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Rotational thromboelastometry in patients with type 2 diabetes and mild COVID-19 pneumonia: A pilot prospective study.

Authors:  Tomáš Bolek; Matej Samoš; Ingrid Škorňová; Martin Schnierer; Jakub Jurica; Peter Bánovčin; Ján Staško; Peter Kubisz; Marián Mokáň
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Biomechanics of haemostasis and thrombosis in health and disease: from the macro- to molecular scale.

Authors:  Reginald Tran; David R Myers; Jordan Ciciliano; Elaissa L Trybus Hardy; Yumiko Sakurai; Byungwook Ahn; Yongzhi Qiu; Robert G Mannino; Meredith E Fay; Wilbur A Lam
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.