OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of lincomycin and oxytetracycline for treatment of digital dermatitis (DD) in dairy cows through gross visual examination, histologic evaluation, and bacteriologic evaluation. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. ANIMALS: 25 cows with DD lesions from a commercial Holstein dairy herd. PROCEDURES: Cows with DD lesions were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: topical treatment with 10 g of lincomycin hydrochloride (n = 11), topical treatment with 10 g of oxytetracycline hydrochloride (11), and no treatment (3) on days 1 and 2 (d1). Biopsy specimens were obtained for histologic examination from DD lesions prior to treatment and 28 or 31 days (d30) after treatment for histologic examination. Cows were clinically examined on d1, days 12 or 14 (d14), and d30. RESULTS: No difference was evident in clinical responses to lincomycin and oxytetracycline, so data were pooled; at d30, 8 of 11 of lincomycin-treated lesions and 7 of 11 oxytetracycline-treated lesions appeared visually healed, respectively. Gross visual examination suggested 73% (16/22) of treated cows were healed at d14 and 68% (15/22) of treated cows were healed on d30. Of the 15 lesions that appeared healed on d30, 7 of 15 were classified histologically as active (ulceration and bacterial invasion; 2/15) or incipient (5/15). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical responses to lincomycin and oxytetracycline did not differ. Agreement was good between gross visual and histologic assessments of DD lesions before treatment; agreement 1 month after treatment was variable. Histologic evaluation could not distinguish incomplete healing from lesion recurrence.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of lincomycin and oxytetracycline for treatment of digital dermatitis (DD) in dairy cows through gross visual examination, histologic evaluation, and bacteriologic evaluation. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. ANIMALS: 25 cows with DD lesions from a commercial Holstein dairy herd. PROCEDURES: Cows with DD lesions were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: topical treatment with 10 g of lincomycin hydrochloride (n = 11), topical treatment with 10 g of oxytetracycline hydrochloride (11), and no treatment (3) on days 1 and 2 (d1). Biopsy specimens were obtained for histologic examination from DD lesions prior to treatment and 28 or 31 days (d30) after treatment for histologic examination. Cows were clinically examined on d1, days 12 or 14 (d14), and d30. RESULTS: No difference was evident in clinical responses to lincomycin and oxytetracycline, so data were pooled; at d30, 8 of 11 of lincomycin-treated lesions and 7 of 11 oxytetracycline-treated lesions appeared visually healed, respectively. Gross visual examination suggested 73% (16/22) of treated cows were healed at d14 and 68% (15/22) of treated cows were healed on d30. Of the 15 lesions that appeared healed on d30, 7 of 15 were classified histologically as active (ulceration and bacterial invasion; 2/15) or incipient (5/15). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical responses to lincomycin and oxytetracycline did not differ. Agreement was good between gross visual and histologic assessments of DD lesions before treatment; agreement 1 month after treatment was variable. Histologic evaluation could not distinguish incomplete healing from lesion recurrence.
Authors: Adam C Krull; Jan K Shearer; Patrick J Gorden; Vickie L Cooper; Gregory J Phillips; Paul J Plummer Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Kaitlyn M Watts; Cristina Fodor; Caroline Beninger; Priyoshi Lahiri; Rakel Arrazuria; Jeroen De Buck; Cameron G Knight; Karin Orsel; Herman W Barkema; Eduardo R Cobo Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Adam C Krull; Vickie L Cooper; John W Coatney; Jan K Shearer; Patrick J Gorden; Paul J Plummer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 3.240