Literature DB >> 20806422

Preliminary validation of an ultra-brief version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.

David Berle1, Vladan Starcevic, Karen Moses, Anthony Hannan, Denise Milicevic, Peter Sammut.   

Abstract

The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is widely regarded as the gold standard self-report questionnaire for pathological worry. However, the factorial structure of the scale remains contentious. We sought to determine whether a psychometrically sound brief version of the PSWQ, which avoids contentious items and yet incorporates the essential features of pathological worry, could be derived from the existing PSWQ item pool. After inspecting items of the PSWQ and the findings of previous factor analytic studies, three items were selected that capture the essence of pathological worry (i.e., high frequency, perceived uncontrollability and multiple domains of worry), according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition). We then compared the psychometric properties of the 3-item PSWQ with the full PSWQ in a sample of 225 clients attending an anxiety disorders clinic. Despite its brevity, the 3-item PSWQ had internal consistency comparable with that of the standard PSWQ, and performed equally well with regards to convergent and discriminant validity, in screening for a generalized anxiety disorder diagnosis and in detecting change with treatment. The 3-item ultra-brief version of the PSWQ is quick to administer, simple to score and possesses psychometric properties very similar to the 16-item version. Further research should confirm the psychometric properties of the 3-item version when administered independently of the other items and assess the scale's test-retest reliability.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20806422     DOI: 10.1002/cpp.724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother        ISSN: 1063-3995


  29 in total

1.  Attention bias towards negative emotional information and its relationship with daily worry in the context of acute stress: An eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Richard J Macatee; Brian J Albanese; Norman B Schmidt; Jesse R Cougle
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2016-12-18

2.  Distress intolerance as a moderator of the relationship between daily stressors and affective symptoms: Tests of incremental and prospective relationships.

Authors:  Richard J Macatee; Brian J Albanese; Nicholas P Allan; Norman B Schmidt; Jesse R Cougle
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Hating Adolescents Test (HAT): a preliminary development of a measure to assess hating among adolescents.

Authors:  Ugo Pace; Giulio D'Urso; Carla Zappulla
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-02-13

4.  The development and validation of scales to measure the presence of a teachable moment following a cardiovascular disease event.

Authors:  Michelle Brust; Winifred A Gebhardt; Nadine A E van der Voorde; Mattijs E Numans; Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-06-27

5.  Identification of developmentally appropriate screening items for disruptive behavior problems in preschoolers.

Authors:  Christina R Studts; Michiel A van Zyl
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-08

6.  Adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies: interactive effects during CBT for social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Amelia Aldao; Hooria Jazaieri; Philippe R Goldin; James J Gross
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2014-03-31

7.  Identifying Unbiased Items for Screening Preschoolers for Disruptive Behavior Problems.

Authors:  Christina R Studts; Jodi Polaha; Michiel A van Zyl
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2017-05-01

8.  Study Protocol: The Heart and Brain Study.

Authors:  Sana Suri; Daniel Bulte; Scott T Chiesa; Klaus P Ebmeier; Peter Jezzard; Sebastian W Rieger; Jemma E Pitt; Ludovica Griffanti; Thomas W Okell; Martin Craig; Michael A Chappell; Nicholas P Blockley; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux; Ashraf W Khir; Alun D Hughes; John E Deanfield; Daria E A Jensen; Sebastian F Green; Veronika Sigutova; Michelle G Jansen; Enikő Zsoldos; Clare E Mackay
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based and mobile stress-management intervention for employees: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elena Heber; David Daniel Ebert; Dirk Lehr; Stephanie Nobis; Matthias Berking; Heleen Riper
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Log in and breathe out: efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an online sleep training for teachers affected by work-related strain--study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hanne Thiart; Dirk Lehr; David Daniel Ebert; Bernhard Sieland; Matthias Berking; Heleen Riper
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.