Literature DB >> 20806156

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.

K Niimi1, M Fujishiro, S Kodashima, O Goto, S Ono, K Hirano, C Minatsuki, N Yamamichi, K Koike.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) provides a high en bloc resection rate with less invasiveness than surgical resection for large or scarring gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, detailed outcomes in colorectal ESD are still lacking. The aim of our study was to elucidate short- and long-term outcomes of colorectal ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 310 consecutive colorectal epithelial neoplasms (146 adenomas, 164 carcinomas), in 290 patients, which fulfilled our indication criteria and were treated with ESD between July 2000 and December 2008 were studied. ESD was done by three skilled endoscopists. As short-term outcomes, rates of en bloc resection, en bloc plus R0 resection, and major complications were analyzed. As long-term outcomes, disease-free and overall survival were assessed in 224 patients.
RESULTS: Rates of en bloc resection and en bloc plus R0 resection were 90.3 % and 74.5 %, respectively. Eight patients underwent additional colectomy due to histopathologically proven possible node-positive cancer. Intraoperative perforations occurred with 14 lesions (4.5 %), which were treated successfully only by endoscopic clipping. Emergent surgery was needed for one case of postoperative perforation. Blood transfusion due to intraoperative massive bleeding was required in 1 case (0.3 %). Postoperative bleeding occurred with four lesions (1.3 %), and was endoscopically managed without blood transfusion. Local recurrence was detected in 4 lesions (4/202 patients, 2.0 %); resection had been piecemeal in all 4. During a median follow-up of 38.7 months (range 12.8 - 104.2), the 3- and 5-year overall/disease-specific survivals were 97.1/100 % and 95.3/100 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal ESD showed favorable long-term outcomes. It may largely replace colectomy for node-negative colorectal epithelial neoplasia. Copyright Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart . New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20806156     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  55 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection--current success and future directions.

Authors:  Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination.

Authors:  Jason Ferreira; Paul Akerman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Passera; Yutaka Saito; Taku Sakamoto; Nozomu Kobayashi; Naoto Sakamoto; Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Keiko Niimi; Tomohiko Ohya; Ken Ohata; Shinichi Okamura; Shinei Iizuka; Yoji Takeuchi; Noriya Uedo; Pietro Fusaroli; Marco Augusto Bonino; Mauro Verra; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal tumor.

Authors:  Keiko Niimi; Rei Ishibashi; Takashi Mitsui; Susumu Aikou; Shinya Kodashima; Hiroharu Yamashita; Nobutake Yamamichi; Yoshihiro Hirata; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Yasuyuki Seto; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

5.  Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Mitsuru Kato; Kenji Tominaga; Takeshi Suzuki; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Frequent occurrence of fever in patients who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumor, but bacteremia is not a significant cause.

Authors:  Kentaro Izumi; Taro Osada; Naoto Sakamoto; Tomohiro Kodani; Yoshie Higashihara; Hideaki Ritsuno; Tomoyoshi Shibuya; Akihito Nagahara; Tatsuo Ogihara; Ken Kikuchi; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of formal training in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Tanimoto; M Lourdes Guerrero; Yoshinori Morita; Jonathan Aguirre-Valadez; Elisa Gomez; Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez; Jose A Estradas-Trujillo; Miguel A Valdovinos; Luis F Uscanga; Rikiya Fujita
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

8.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors involving the appendiceal orifice.

Authors:  Tomoaki Tashima; Ken Ohata; Kouichi Nonaka; Eiji Sakai; Yohei Minato; Hajime Horiuchi; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Factors Associated with Fibrosis during Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Does Pretreatment Biopsy Potentially Elicit Submucosal Fibrosis and Affect Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes?

Authors:  Masatake Kuroha; Hisashi Shiga; Yoshitake Kanazawa; Hiroshi Nagai; Tomoyuki Handa; Ryo Ichikawa; Motoyuki Onodera; Takeo Naito; Rintaro Moroi; Tomoya Kimura; Katsuya Endo; Yoichi Kakuta; Yoshitaka Kinouchi; Tooru Shimosegawa; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Risk factors for vertical incomplete resection in endoscopic submucosal dissection as total excisional biopsy for submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shun-ichiro Ozawa; Shinji Tanaka; Nana Hayashi; Soki Nishiyama; Motomi Terasaki; Koichi Nakadoi; Hiroyuki Kanao; Shiro Oka; Shigeto Yoshida; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.