Literature DB >> 20806042

A novel mutation in GJA8 causing congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome in a Chinese pedigree.

Shanshan Hu1, Binbin Wang, Zhou Zhou, Guangkai Zhou, Jing Wang, Xu Ma, Yanhua Qi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the underlying genetic defect in a four-generation family of Chinese origin with autosomal dominant congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome (CCMC).
METHODS: All individuals in the study underwent a full clinical examination and the details of history were collected . Genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method and the exons of all candidate genes were sequenced.
RESULTS: Direct sequencing of the encoding regions of the candidate genes revealed a heterozygous mutation c.592C-->T in exon 2 of the gap junction protein, alpha 8 (GJA8) gene. This mutation was responsible for the familial disorder through the substitution of a highly conserved arginine to tryptophan at codon 198 (p.R198W). This change co-segregated with all affected members of the family, but was not detected either in the non-carrier relatives or in the 100 normal controls.
CONCLUSIONS: This report is the first to relate p.R198W mutation in GJA8 with CCMC. The result expands the mutation spectrum of GJA8 in associated with congenital cataract and microcornea, and implies that this gene has direct involvement with the development of the lens as well as the other anterior segment of the eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20806042      PMCID: PMC2927419     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Vis        ISSN: 1090-0535            Impact factor:   2.367


Introduction

Cataract, the opacification of all or part of the lens, is a common ocular disease that causes blindness in millions of people around the world [1]. The opaque lens, which frequently leads to eyesight reduction and even complete loss of sight, can be congenital or acquired [2]. Although congenital cataract is much less common than age-related cataract, it is still responsible for approximately 10% of childhood blindness worldwide [3]. Inheritance accounts for at least 50% of all congenital cataracts, compared with other factors [4]. From a genetic standpoint, congenital cataract is primarily an autosomal dominant disorder, although autosomal recessive and X-linked patterns have also been reported [5]. Inherited cataract commonly presents in an isolated fashion, a component of other ocular disorders, or a part of systemic syndromes. Cataract-microcornea syndrome (CCMC, OMIM 116150) is characterized by the association of congenital cataract and microcornea without any other systemic abnormality. Microcornea is defined as a horizontal corneal diameter of less than 10.00 mm [6], and appears as a distinct phenotype affecting 12%–18% of congenital cataract cases [7]. To date, more than seven genes have been reported in association with congenital cataract and microcornea. These genes have been identified as coding for three crystallins (αA-crystallin [CRYAA], βB1-crystallin [CRYBB1], and γD-crystallin [CRYGD]) [6,8], one gap junctional protein (gap junction protein, alpha 8 [GJA8]) [8], and two transcription factors (Maf-like protein gene [MAF] and paired box gene 6 [PAX6]) [7,9]. Several other loci have also been linked to CCMC, but the mutant genes have not yet been identified. In the present study, a human inherited autosomal dominant CCMC was analyzed in a four-generation Chinese pedigree. A missense mutation in GJA8 was detected, which was responsible for the disease in this family.

Methods

Family description and clinical examination

A four-generation Chinese family with autosomal dominant congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome was recruited from Heilongjiang province in the Northeast of China. Three affected patients, four non-carrier relatives, and 100 healthy normal controls were involved in this study. All participants underwent ophthalmologic examinations, including visual acuity tests, slit-lamp, corneal diameter and axial length measurements, and fundus examination of the dilated pupil. Informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki was obtained from all individuals. Ethical approval for this study was received from the Heilongjiang Institutional Review Board.

Genomic DNA preparation

Five milliliter peripheral blood from seven members (three affected and four non-carrier relatives) of the family and controls was collected and preserved at −20 °C in EDTA. Genomic DNA was extracted by QIAamp DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen Science, Germantown, MD).

Candidate gene screening

All exons of candidate genes related to CCMC were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method using the primers listed in Table 1. The PCR reaction mixture (50 µl) contained 2 µl 10× PCR Buffer, 10 pmol primer pairs, 200 µmol/l dNTP mix, 1 unit of Taq polymerase, and 80 ng genomic DNA. PCR cycling conditions were as follows: pre-degeneration at 95 °C for 5 min, then 40 cycles of denaturation, annealing and extension, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min, and a last hold at 4 °C. The PCR products were subsequently purified using a TIANgel Midi Purification Kit (Tiangen Biltech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China), and then sequenced with an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Sequencing results were analyzed using Chromas 2.22 software (Technelysium Pty. Ltd., QLD, Australia) with reference sequences in the NCBI Gene Bank.
Table 1

Primers used for candidate genes amplification related with congenital cataract and microcornea.

ExonForward primer (5′-3′)Reverse primer (5′-3′)Product length (bp)Annealing temperature (°C)
CRYAA-1
5′-AGCAGCCTTCTTCATGAGC-3′
5′-CAAGACCAGAGTCCATCG-3′
584
60.6
CRYAA-2
5′-GGCAGGTGACCGAAGCATC-3′
5′-GAAGGCATGGTGCAGGTG-3′
550
61.9
CRYAA-3
5′-GCAGCTTCTCTGGCATGG-3′
5′-GGGAAGCAAAGGAAGACAGA-3′
511
60
CRYBB1–1
5′-GGCAGAGGGAGAGCAGAGTG-3′
5′-CACTAGGCAGGAGAACTGGG-3′
380
58.3
CRYBB1–2
5′-AGTGAGCAGCAGAGCCAGAA-3′
5′-GGTCAGTCACTGCCTTATGG-3′
301
61
CRYBB1–3
5′-AAGCACAGAGTCAGACTGAAGT-3′
5′-CCCCTGTCTGAAGGGACCTG-3′
346
62.5
CRYBB1–4
5′-GTACAGCTCTACTGGGATTG-3′
5′-ACTGATGATAAATAGCATGAACG-3′
400
58.3
CRYBB1–5
5′-CGAGGAAGTCACATCCCAGT-3′
5′-CACAGAGCAGGAAGGGATA-3′'
497
62.5
CRYGC-1
5′-TGCATAAAATCCCCTTACCG-3′
5′-CCTCCCTGTAACCCACATTG-3′
514
59.2
CRYGC-2
5′-TGGTTGGACAAATTCTGGAAG-3′
5′-CCCACCCCATTCACTTCTTA-3′
430
60.2
CRYGD-1
5′-CAGCAGCCCTCCTGCTAT-3′
5′-GGGTCCTGACTTGAGGATGT-3′
550
60.3
CRYGD-2
5′-GCTTTTCTTCTCTTTTTATTTCTGG-3′
5′-AAGAAAGACACAAGCAAATCAGT-3′
308
58.5
GJA8–1
5′-CCGCGTTAGCAAAAACAGAT-3′
5′-CCTCCATGCGGACGTAGT-3′
420
56
GJA8–2
5′-GCAGATCATCTTCGTCTCCA-3′
5′-GGCCACAGACAACATGAACA-3′
330
60
GJA8–3
5′-CCACGGAGAAAACCATCTTC-3′
5′-GAGCGTAGGAAGGCAGTGTC-3′
350
58
GJA8–4
5′-TCGAGGAGAAGATCAGCACA-3′
5′-GGCTGCTGGCTTTGCTTAG-3′
500
58
MAF-1
5′-GTGGCGAGCATGGCTCTA-3′
5′-CCGCACTACCACCACCAC-3′
683
61.1
MAF-2
5′-TACGCTGCGTTTGATCTTTG-3′
5′-AGGTGGTTCTCCATGACTGC-3′
224
61.4
MAF-3
5′-GTGGTGGTGGTGGTAGTGC-3′
5′-CTCTCCTGCAGCCCATCTG-3′
611
65
PAX6–4
5′-ACCTCGGTTGGGAGTTCAG-3′
5′-CGAAGTCCCAGAAAGACCAG-3′
161
54.6
PAX6–5
5′-TGTGGTTGTCTCCTCCTCCT-3′
5′-GGGGTCCATAATTAGCATCG-3′
392
62.5
PAX6–6-7
5′-AACGCCACTTTAAGCAAGGT-3′
5′-GGAGGGCAGATGTTCTCAA-3′
620
62.5
PAX6–8
5′-AATCCACCCACTGTCCCG-3′
5′-CCAGCCACCTTCATACCG-3′
542
64.1
PAX6–9
5′-TCAGGTAACTAACATCGCA-3′
5′-GTTGACTGTACTTGGAAGAA-3′
719
62.5
PAX6–10
5′-AGGTGGGAACCAGTTTGATG-3′
5′-CATGGCAGCAGAGCATTTAG-3′
311
64.1
PAX6–11–12
5′-TTCAGTCTGCTAAATGCTCTGC-3′
5′-AGTGCGAAAAGCTCTCAAGG-3′
592
62.5
PAX6–13
5′-GAGGCTTGATACATAGGC-3′
5′-CCATAAGACCAGGAGATT-3′
452
64.1
PAX6–145′-TTCCATGTCTGTTTCACAAAGG-3′5′-GCCATTTTTCTTTCTTTCCTGA-3′57864.1

Summary of the primers and annealing temperatures used for the amplification of the all exons of candidate genes related with congenital cataract and microcornea.

Summary of the primers and annealing temperatures used for the amplification of the all exons of candidate genes related with congenital cataract and microcornea.

Protein structure analysis

The PolyPhen program was used in the bioinformatics study to predict the possible impact of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of human proteins. The prediction was based on the caculation of position-specific independent counts (PSIC) score deduced from multiple sequence alignments of observation. PSIC scores of ≤0.5 represented that the polymorphism was benign to protein function; scores of 0.5–2.0 were possibly damaging; scores of 2.0 were propably damaging [10]. The secondary structures and hydrophobic properties of mutant and wild-type amino acid sequences were analyzed by Jpred 3 software and Misc Protein Analysis software, respectively.

Results

Clinical findings

There were five affected individuals in this Chinese family, and three of them (II:6, III:3, and III:5) participated in this study (Figure 1). At the time of this study, all patients had undergone cataract extraction surgeries. Therefore, the clinical findings (summarized in Table 2) were obtained from the medical records. The proband (III:3), a 24-year-old man, was diagnosed with bilateral CCMC at five years of age. The horizontal diameters of his corneas were less than 10 mm. The axial length of his eyes was 25.2 mm oculus dexter (OD) and 24.8 mm oculus sinister (OS), respectively. His mother and sister also showed similar clinical symptoms. Apart from congenital cataract and microcornea, no other eye abnormalities such as microphthalmia, iris coloboma or nystagmus were detected in any of these patients.
Figure 1

Pedigree of the family with autosomal dominant congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome. Squares and circles indicate males and females, respectively, and the black symbols represent the affected members. The asterisks indicate those subjects who underwent clinical and molecular analyses. The arrow indicates the proband.

Table 2

The clinical findings of individuals in this study.



Horizontal corneal diameter (mm)
Axial length (mm)
IndividualAge at cataract surgeryRight (OD)Left (OS)Right (OD)Left (OS)
II:4
-
11.5
11.5
23.9
24.6
II:5
-
10.5
11.0
24.4
24.2
II:6
10 years
9.0
10.0
24.2
24.7
III:3
5 years
9.5
9.5
25.2
24.8
III:4
-
11.6
11.8
25.1
24.6
III:5
6 years
9.5
9.5
24.6
24.7
IV:1-11.511.624.224.6

Three affected patients (II:6, III:3, and III:5), four non-carrier relatives (II:4, II:5, III:4, and IV:1) were involved in this study. The clinical findings of individuals were summarized.

Pedigree of the family with autosomal dominant congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome. Squares and circles indicate males and females, respectively, and the black symbols represent the affected members. The asterisks indicate those subjects who underwent clinical and molecular analyses. The arrow indicates the proband. Three affected patients (II:6, III:3, and III:5), four non-carrier relatives (II:4, II:5, III:4, and IV:1) were involved in this study. The clinical findings of individuals were summarized.

Mutation detection

In all affected individuals, bidirectional sequencing of the coding regions of the candidate genes revealed a heterozygous missense mutation, C→T, at nucleotide 592 in exon 2 of GJA8 (Figure 2A). This mutation resulted in the replacement of a highly conserved arginine by tryptophan (Figure 2C). This change co-segregated with the affected members of the family, but was not detected in either non-carrier relatives or 100 normal controls (Figure 2B). No other mutations were found except for the non-pathogenic SNPs.
Figure 2

Mutation analysis of GJA8. A: Partial nucleotide sequence of GJA8 from an affected individual. The sequence in affected individuals showed a heterozygous C→T transversion (indicated by the arrow), resulting in a substitution of arginine for tryptophan at amino acid residue 198. B: Unaffected individuals and the control subjects lacked this nucleotide change. C: The alignment of the GJA8 sequence with the corresponding segments in diverse species was shown. The 198th arginine was highly conserved in connexin 50 proteins from several species.

Mutation analysis of GJA8. A: Partial nucleotide sequence of GJA8 from an affected individual. The sequence in affected individuals showed a heterozygous C→T transversion (indicated by the arrow), resulting in a substitution of arginine for tryptophan at amino acid residue 198. B: Unaffected individuals and the control subjects lacked this nucleotide change. C: The alignment of the GJA8 sequence with the corresponding segments in diverse species was shown. The 198th arginine was highly conserved in connexin 50 proteins from several species.

Potential function prediction

After input the amino acid sequences of the wild-type GJA8 protein and the mutant, the PSIC score from Polyphen analysis was 3.149, which meant that the variant (p.R198W) was predicted as being “probably damaging” with high confidence. In comparison with the wild-type GJA8 protein, the hydrophobicity of the mutant was dramatically increased (Figure 3). The secondary structure prediction suggested that the mutation R198W led to a turn replaced by a helix. (Figure 4).
Figure 3

Hydrophobicity prediction of the wild-type (A) and the mutant (B) GJA8 protein. The region of the substitution on the GJA8 protein is boxed, it is obvious that the mutant type has a higher hydrophobicity in this region compared with the wild type.

Figure 4

The predicted secondary structures of the wild-type and the mutant-type GJA8 sequences. The predicted secondary structures of the wild-type GJA8 sequence (A) and the mutant-type sequence (B) are shown. The target sequences are labeled by red, which indicate that there is a turn in the wild type replaced by a helix in the mutant type.

Hydrophobicity prediction of the wild-type (A) and the mutant (B) GJA8 protein. The region of the substitution on the GJA8 protein is boxed, it is obvious that the mutant type has a higher hydrophobicity in this region compared with the wild type. The predicted secondary structures of the wild-type and the mutant-type GJA8 sequences. The predicted secondary structures of the wild-type GJA8 sequence (A) and the mutant-type sequence (B) are shown. The target sequences are labeled by red, which indicate that there is a turn in the wild type replaced by a helix in the mutant type.

Discussion

We identified a novel missense mutation, p.R198W, in gap junction alpha-8 protein (GJA8) for a four-generation Chinese pedigree with autosomal dominant congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome (CCMC). According to Polyphen analysis, the R198W was predicted to probably damage the structure and function of the protein, which emphasized the functional importance of this site. The replacement of a hydrophilic arginine by a hydrophobic tryptophan at position 198 might increase the hydrophobicity of the protein, which was propitious to the formation of the helix. The secondary structure prediction showed that the mutation led to a turn replaced by a helix, which was in accordance with the hydrophobicity prediction. This suggested that the mutation may cause to the conformation change of the mutant protein. Mutations in GJA8 have been considered as cataractogenesis in humans. To date, 16 mutations in this gene have been identified to contribute to assorted phenotypic cataracts, five of which were associated with CCMC phenotype (Table 3). In addition to the novel R198W mutation, another mutation (p.R198Q) of the same codon has been reported in an Indian family with CCMC [11]. However, the affected amino acid was different. In our family, the c.592C>T change resulted in a R198W mutation, while the c.593G>A change led to a R198Q mutation in the Indian family. Our finding further expands the mutation spectrum of GJA8 in associated with congenital cataract and microcornea.
Table 3

Mutations of GJA8 in association with congenital cataract.

MutationPhenotypeClinical featureEthnicMode of inheritanceReference
P.R23T
Nuclear cataract
dense nuclear (fetal/embryonal)
Iranian
Dominant
[18]
p.I31T
Congenital nuclear cataract
Congenital nuclear cataract
Chinese
Dominant
[19]
p.V44E
CCMC
Total lens opacification and microcornea
Indian
Dominant
[11]
p.W45S
CCMC
Opacity appeared axial, extending from the anterior capsule to the posterior capsule. comprised about a dozen finger-like projections radiating in all directions, and microcornea
Indian
Dominant
[20]
p.D47Y
Congenital nuclear cataract
Congenital nuclear cataract
Chinese
Dominant
[21]
p.D47N
Nuclear pulverulent
Pulverulent opacities confined to the fetal and embryonal nucleus
English
Dominant
[4]
p.E48K
Zonular pulverulent cataract
Dust-like opacities, more dense throughout the nucleus. Several cortical riders in the zonular region
Paskistani
Dominant
[22]
p.V64G
Nuclear cataract
Congenital nuclear cataract
Chinese
Dominant
[23]
p.V79L
Full-moon cataract with Y-sutural
full moon with both the Y-sutures being affected. The fetal nucleus surrounding the embryonal nucleus showed very fine white granular opacities.
Indian
Dominant
[24]
p.P88S
Zonular pulverulent cataract
innumerable powdery opacities located in the nuclear and lamellar zones. Affects both the embryonic and fetal nucleus
English
Dominant
[25]
p.P88Q
Balloon-like cataract with Y-sutural opacities
Fetal nucleus and Y-sutures affected. Between the Y-sutures, feathery opacities are present.Three riders present at the perimetry of opaque fetal nucleus
Indian
Dominant
[26]
p.P88Q
Pulverulent nuclear cataract
Pulverulent opacities in the fetal nucleus
British
Dominant
[27]
p.P189L
CCMC
Star-shaped nuclear opacity with a whitish central core and microcornea
Danish
Dominant
[8]
p.R198Q
CCMC
Posterior subcapsular cataract and microcornea
Indian
Dominant
[11]
p.R198W
CCMC
Nucler cataract associated with microcornea
Chinese
Dominant
This study
p.203fs
Cataract and microcornea
Total cataract associated with microcornea, microphthalmia
Indian
Recessive
[28]
p.S276F
Pulverulent nuclear cataract
White granular opacities in fetal and embryonal nucleus
Chinese
Dominant
[29]
c.776insGTriangular nuclear cataractDense, triangular nuclear cataract.At the periphery, additional opaque zones can be observedGermanyRecessive [30]

Summary of the mutations identified in GJA8 provide the different congenital cataract phenotypes with different families belonging to different ethnic groups. Five of these mutations are associated with microcornea.

Summary of the mutations identified in GJA8 provide the different congenital cataract phenotypes with different families belonging to different ethnic groups. Five of these mutations are associated with microcornea. GJA8 (NM_005267) is located on chromosome 1q21.1 and encodes a 50 kDa protein (connexin 50; Cx50). Cx50, consisting of 433 amino acids, is a member of the connexin family of proteins that are important to the formation of gap junction channels [12]. These channels are responsible for direct intercellular transfer of ions and molecules up to 1,000 Da between adjacent cells [13]. Since the eye lens is an avascular structure, it relies heavily on an intercellular communication system constructed of gap junctions for preservation of tissue homeostasis and transparency [14]. Like other connexins, Cx50 contains four transmembrane domains (M1, M2, M3, and M4) linked by two extracellular loops (E1 and E2), as well as an intracellular loop (CL), and intracytoplasmic NH2- and COOH-termini [11]. The extracellular loop of the connexin protein is a highly conserved and functionally important domain in gap junction channels by multiple-sequence analysis among different species (Figure 2C). The p.R198W substitution observed in the present study is located within the E2 loop of Cx50 and it results in the replacement of a highly conserved basic arginine by a neutral tryptophan at position 198. The extracellular loops have been proven to be important for the docking of the two hemichannels to form a gap junction unit. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the second extracellular domain is a determinant of compatibility between connexins [15]. Therefore, the mutant protein (p.R198W) may disrupt the intercellular communication mediated by gap junction channels and subseqently affect the transparency of the lens. Cataractogenesis has been detected by targeted gene disruption in mice. In contrast to the connexin 46 knockout mice exhibiting nuclear cataracts, the target disruption of connexin 50 mice developed microphthalmia with small lenses and nuclear cataracts [16]. While connexin 46 was expressed in place of connexin 50, the len was clear, but the size was subnormal [17]. It was concluded that GJA8 played an important role in lens and eye growth, as well as in the lens fiber cell differentiation and maturation. In summary, the study provides the first report of a heterozygous c.592 C→T mutation of GJA8 in a Chinese pedigree with congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome (CCMC). This broadens the mutation spectrum of GJA8. The results of this study may help to further clarify the pathogenesis of congenital cataract and microcornea.
  29 in total

1.  Unique and redundant connexin contributions to lens development.

Authors:  Thomas W White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A novel GJA8 mutation in an Iranian family with progressive autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract.

Authors:  C E Willoughby; Sara Arab; R Gandhi; S Zeinali; Seddigheh Arab; D Luk; G Billingsley; F L Munier; E Héon
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Plasma membrane channels formed by connexins: their regulation and functions.

Authors:  Juan C Saez; Viviana M Berthoud; Maria C Branes; Agustin D Martinez; Eric C Beyer
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Missense mutation in the alternative splice region of the PAX6 gene in eye anomalies.

Authors:  N Azuma; Y Yamaguchi; H Handa; M Hayakawa; A Kanai; M Yamada
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A missense mutation in the human connexin50 gene (GJA8) underlies autosomal dominant "zonular pulverulent" cataract, on chromosome 1q.

Authors:  A Shiels; D Mackay; A Ionides; V Berry; A Moore; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Molecular genetic basis of inherited cataract and associated phenotypes.

Authors:  M Ashwin Reddy; Peter J Francis; Vanita Berry; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Anthony T Moore
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Loss of function and impaired degradation of a cataract-associated mutant connexin50.

Authors:  Viviana M Berthoud; Peter J Minogue; Jun Guo; Edward K Williamson; Xiaorong Xu; Lisa Ebihara; Eric C Beyer
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Selective interactions among the multiple connexin proteins expressed in the vertebrate lens: the second extracellular domain is a determinant of compatibility between connexins.

Authors:  T W White; R Bruzzone; S Wolfram; D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  A novel GJA8 mutation (p.I31T) causing autosomal dominant congenital cataract in a Chinese family.

Authors:  Kaijie Wang; Binbin Wang; Jing Wang; Shiyi Zhou; Bo Yun; Peisu Suo; Jie Cheng; Xu Ma; Siquan Zhu
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Targeted ablation of connexin50 in mice results in microphthalmia and zonular pulverulent cataracts.

Authors:  T W White; D A Goodenough; D L Paul
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-11-02       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Inherited Congenital Cataract: A Guide to Suspect the Genetic Etiology in the Cataract Genesis.

Authors:  Olga Messina-Baas; Sergio A Cuevas-Covarrubias
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-02-07

2.  A novel Cx50 (GJA8) p.H277Y mutation associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract identified with targeted next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Chong Chen; Qiao Sun; Mingmin Gu; Kun Liu; Yong Sun; Xun Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Homozygous mutations in PXDN cause congenital cataract, corneal opacity, and developmental glaucoma.

Authors:  Kamron Khan; Adam Rudkin; David A Parry; Kathryn P Burdon; Martin McKibbin; Clare V Logan; Zakia I A Abdelhamed; James S Muecke; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Kate J Laurie; Mike Shires; Rhys Fogarty; Ian M Carr; James A Poulter; Joanne E Morgan; Moin D Mohamed; Hussain Jafri; Yasmin Raashid; Ngy Meng; Horm Piseth; Carmel Toomes; Robert J Casson; Graham R Taylor; Michael Hammerton; Eamonn Sheridan; Colin A Johnson; Chris F Inglehearn; Jamie E Craig; Manir Ali
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Exome sequencing identifies a novel mutation in GJA8 associated with inherited cataract in a Chinese family.

Authors:  Mei Ren; Xin Guang Yang; Xiao Jie Dang; Jin An Xiao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Mutation screening and genotype phenotype correlation of α-crystallin, γ-crystallin and GJA8 gene in congenital cataract.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Tushar Agarwal; Sudarshan Khokhar; Manoj Kumar; Punit Kaur; Tara Sankar Roy; Rima Dada
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Another evidence for a D47N mutation in GJA8 associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract.

Authors:  Li Wang; Yi Luo; Wen Wen; Shenghai Zhang; Yi Lu
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.367

7.  Mutational screening of six genes in Chinese patients with congenital cataract and microcornea.

Authors:  Wenmin Sun; Xueshan Xiao; Shiqiang Li; Xiangming Guo; Qingjiong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Cataracts and microphthalmia caused by a Gja8 mutation in extracellular loop 2.

Authors:  Chun-Hong Xia; Bo Chang; Adam M Derosa; Catherine Cheng; Thomas W White; Xiaohua Gong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Connexin mutants and cataracts.

Authors:  Eric C Beyer; Lisa Ebihara; Viviana M Berthoud
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Identification and functional analysis of GJA8 mutation in a Chinese family with autosomal dominant perinuclear cataracts.

Authors:  Dongmei Su; Zhenfei Yang; Qian Li; Lina Guan; Huiling Zhang; Dandan E; Lei Zhang; Siquan Zhu; Xu Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.