Literature DB >> 20805749

Ultrasound pregnancy dating leads to biased perinatal morbidity and neonatal mortality among post-term-born girls.

Alkistis Skalkidou1, Helle Kieler, Olof Stephansson, Nathalie Roos, Sven Cnattingius, Bengt Haglund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound assessment of gestational length is based on the assumption that fetuses of the same gestational age have equal size at the time of investigation. However, there are detectable sex differences in fetal size by the end of the first trimester. We examined whether ultrasound dating introduces sex differences in risks of adverse perinatal outcomes related to post-term birth.
METHODS: We used the Swedish Medical Birth Register to compare male and female newborns during 1973-1978, when gestational age was based on the last menstrual period, and 1995-2007, when gestational age was based on ultrasound. We included singleton births from 39 to 43 gestational weeks.
RESULTS: During the first time period, the newborn male-to-female ratio by gestational age at delivery was constant around 1.0, but in the later time period it consistently increased by gestational age, reaching 1.60 at 43 weeks. In the first time period, post-term females had reduced risk for adverse perinatal outcomes compared with post-term males. After the introduction of ultrasound, post-term females had higher risks of stillbirth (odds ratio = 1.60 [95% confidence interval = 1.11 to 2.30]) and meconium aspiration (1.39 [1.10 to 1.75]), compared with post-term males. One-third of stillbirths among post-term girls today might be due to incorrect calculation of gestational age.
CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of ultrasound for the estimation of gestational age may be associated with increased risks of adverse perinatal outcomes among females classified as post-term compared with their male counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20805749     DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f3a660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  8 in total

1.  Adverse Infant Outcomes Associated with Discordant Gestational Age Estimates.

Authors:  Nils-Halvdan Morken; Rolv Skjaerven; Jennifer L Richards; Michael R Kramer; Sven Cnattingius; Stefan Johansson; Mika Gissler; Siobhan M Dolan; Jennifer Zeitlin; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Effects of ultrasound pregnancy dating on neonatal morbidity in late preterm and early term male infants: a register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Merit Kullinger; Bengt Haglund; Helle Kieler; Alkistis Skalkidou
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population.

Authors:  Sander Galjaard; Lieveke Ameye; Christoph C Lees; Anne Pexsters; Tom Bourne; Dirk Timmerman; Roland Devlieger
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.027

4.  Do parental heights influence pregnancy length?: A population-based prospective study, HUNT 2.

Authors:  Kirsti Myklestad; Lars Johan Vatten; Elisabeth Balstad Magnussen; Kjell Åsmund Salvesen; Pål Richard Romundstad
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Infants born large-for-gestational-age display slower growth in early infancy, but no epigenetic changes at birth.

Authors:  Valentina Chiavaroli; Wayne S Cutfield; José G B Derraik; Zengxiang Pan; Sherry Ngo; Allan Sheppard; Susan Craigie; Peter Stone; Lynn Sadler; Fredrik Ahlsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Perinatal mortality by gestational week and size at birth in singleton pregnancies at and beyond term: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Nils-Halvdan Morken; Kari Klungsøyr; Rolv Skjaerven
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Maternal and fetal characteristics affect discrepancies between pregnancy-dating methods: a population-based cross-sectional register study.

Authors:  Merit Kullinger; Jan Wesström; Helle Kieler; Alkistis Skalkidou
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Discrepancy between pregnancy dating methods affects obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a population-based register cohort study.

Authors:  Merit Kullinger; Michaela Granfors; Helle Kieler; Alkistis Skalkidou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.