Literature DB >> 20805430

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes in relation to renal function: results from the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.

Stefan James1, Andrzej Budaj, Philip Aylward, Kristen K Buck, Christopher P Cannon, Jan H Cornel, Robert A Harrington, Jay Horrow, Hugo Katus, Matyas Keltai, Basil S Lewis, Keyur Parikh, Robert F Storey, Karolina Szummer, Daniel Wojdyla, Lars Wallentin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduced renal function is associated with a poorer prognosis and increased bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes and may therefore alter the risk-benefit ratio with antiplatelet therapies. In the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel reduced the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 12 months but with similar major bleeding rates. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Central laboratory serum creatinine levels were available in 15 202 (81.9%) acute coronary syndrome patients at baseline, and creatinine clearance, estimated by the Cockcroft Gault equation, was calculated. In patients with chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min; n=3237), ticagrelor versus clopidogrel significantly reduced the primary end point to 17.3% from 22.0% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.90) with an absolute risk reduction greater than that of patients with normal renal function (n=11 965): 7.9% versus 8.9% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02). In patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor reduced total mortality (10.0% versus 14.0%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.89). Major bleeding rates, fatal bleedings, and non-coronary bypass-related major bleedings were not significantly different between the 2 randomized groups (15.1% versus 14.3%; HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.30; 0.34% versus 0.77%; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.54; and 8.5% versus 7.3%; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.68). The interactions between creatinine clearance and randomized treatment on any of the outcome variables were nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: In acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease, ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduces ischemic end points and mortality without a significant increase in major bleeding but with numerically more non-procedure-related bleeding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL:http://www.clinicatrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20805430     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  87 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of more potent antiplatelet therapy with vorapaxar in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  Simon Correa; Marc P Bonaca; Benjamin M Scirica; Sabina A Murphy; Erica L Goodrich; David A Morrow; Michelle L O'Donoghue
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Antiplatelet therapy: Net benefit of ticagrelor in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Noel C Chan; Jacqueline Bosch
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 3.  Which antiplatelet agent for whom? Which patient populations benefit most from novel antiplatelet agents (ticagrelor, prasugrel)?

Authors:  Christoph Varenhorst; Stefan James
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Chronic kidney disease in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Giancarlo Marenzi; Angelo Cabiati; Emilio Assanelli
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-06

5.  Fresh from the pipeline. Ticagrelor.

Authors:  Kurt Huber; Bashar Hamad; Peter Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  The P2Y(12) receptor as a target of antithrombotic drugs.

Authors:  Stephen O'Connor; Gilles Montalescot; Jean-Philippe Collet
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.765

Review 7.  How to balance risks and benefits in the management of CKD patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Giancarlo Marenzi; Nicola Cosentino; Carlo Guastoni
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 8.  A transition of P2Y12 antagonists for acute coronary syndrome: benefits, risks and costs.

Authors:  Wei Eric Wang; Hongyong Wang; Xukai Wang; Chunyu Zeng
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease, Thrombotic Cardiovascular Events, and Use of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors among Veterans.

Authors:  Manisha Singh; Deepa Raghavan; James S Williams; Bradley C Martin; Teresa J Hudson; Richard R Owen; Nishank Jain
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 10.  Acute coronary syndromes: advances in antithrombotics.

Authors:  Nilusha Gukathasan; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.