AIM: To study the GNAQ mutational status in a series of uveal melanomas and evaluate possible associations with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway protein expression and tumour proliferation markers. METHODS: Mutational analysis was performed by PCR/sequencing of exon 5 of the GNAQ gene in a series of 22 uveal melanomas in which total and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 overexpression without coexistent BRAF and NRAS mutations had previously been observed. Expression of the cell cycle markers (Ki-67, cyclin D1 and p27) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The association between GNAQ mutational status, ERK1/2, phospho-ERK1/2, Ki-67, cyclin D1 and p27 expression levels and the clinicopathological prognostic parameters of uveal melanomas was also assessed. RESULTS: GNAQ mutations were found in 36% of uveal melanomas. No associations were found between the GNAQ mutational status and prognostic parameters, the expression of ERK1/2, pERK1/2 and cell cycle markers. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that GNAQ mutated uveal melanomas do not exhibit a higher deregulation of proliferation or higher activation of the MAPK signalling pathway than uveal melanomas without GNAQ overactivation.
AIM: To study the GNAQ mutational status in a series of uveal melanomas and evaluate possible associations with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway protein expression and tumour proliferation markers. METHODS: Mutational analysis was performed by PCR/sequencing of exon 5 of the GNAQ gene in a series of 22 uveal melanomas in which total and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 overexpression without coexistent BRAF and NRAS mutations had previously been observed. Expression of the cell cycle markers (Ki-67, cyclin D1 and p27) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The association between GNAQ mutational status, ERK1/2, phospho-ERK1/2, Ki-67, cyclin D1 and p27 expression levels and the clinicopathological prognostic parameters of uveal melanomas was also assessed. RESULTS:GNAQ mutations were found in 36% of uveal melanomas. No associations were found between the GNAQ mutational status and prognostic parameters, the expression of ERK1/2, pERK1/2 and cell cycle markers. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that GNAQ mutated uveal melanomas do not exhibit a higher deregulation of proliferation or higher activation of the MAPK signalling pathway than uveal melanomas without GNAQ overactivation.
Authors: Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Fotini Nicolaou; Katarzyna Brodowska; Thanos D Papakostas; Anna Marmalidou; Bruce R Ksander; Joan W Miller; Evangelos Gragoudas; Demetrios G Vavvas Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Bjoern Schneider; Katrin Riedel; Andrey Zhivov; Maja Huehns; Heike Zettl; Rudolf F Guthoff; Anselm Jünemann; Andreas Erbersdobler; Annette Zimpfer Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Wenbin Tan; Margarita Chernova; Lin Gao; Victor Sun; Huaxu Liu; Wangcun Jia; Stephanie Langer; Gang Wang; Martin C Mihm; J Stuart Nelson Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2014-08-16 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Vivian Chua; Dominic Lapadula; Clinita Randolph; Jeffrey L Benovic; Philip B Wedegaertner; Andrew E Aplin Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Christian Posch; Alfonso Latorre; Michelle B Crosby; Anna Celli; Ana Latorre; Igor Vujic; Martina Sanlorenzo; Gary A Green; Jingly Weier; Mitchell Zekhtser; Jeffrey Ma; Gabriela Monico; Devron H Char; Denis Jusufbegovic; Klemens Rappersberger; Álvaro Somoza; Susana Ortiz-Urda Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.838
Authors: Paula Silva-Rodríguez; Daniel Fernández-Díaz; Manuel Bande; María Pardo; Lourdes Loidi; María José Blanco-Teijeiro Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Helena Pópulo; Sandra Tavares; Alexandra Faustino; Joana B Nunes; José Manuel Lopes; Paula Soares Journal: PeerJ Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: W Tan; J Wang; F Zhou; L Gao; R Yin; H Liu; A Sukanthanag; G Wang; M C Mihm; D-B Chen; J S Nelson Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 11.113